ClickCease

Results for final pay

Showing 25-32 of 223 results
Qi Sun v Keene Construction Limited [2026] NZERA 465 - builder dismissed by text after querying apprenticeship costs

Qi Sun was an apprentice builder with Keene Construction when he queried an unpaid $300 apprenticeship-cost payment. The director then texted that there would not be a company and told him not to bother coming to work, creating a dispute about whether those messages amounted to dismissal.

Matched passage: However, Mr Sun succeeded on final-week wages, two weeks' contractual notice, and unpaid annual holidays shown on his final payslip.
PIACUN v COOPER NO 1 LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 32 - business sale did not avoid notice; dismissal unjustified

Cooper No 1 sold its business and told Ms Piacun her employment was ending, without paying a notice period. The ERA considered whether the sale itself ended employment or whether Cooper had taken the initiative to terminate her contract.

Matched passage: Ultimately, Ms Piacun's final payslip shows she was paid $11,076.
Cameron Keen v Prestige Paving NZ Limited [2026] NZERA 344 - unjustified dismissal after employer stopped providing work and pay

Cameron Keen's work and pay with Prestige Paving stopped after the employer ceased providing him with work rather than carrying out a formal dismissal process. The ERA examined whether that practical exclusion from employment amounted to a dismissal and whether any justification existed.

Matched passage: After a Christmas closedown, Prestige failed to bring Mr Keen back to work, failed to pay him when he was available for work, placed him on leave without pay without him requesting it, and then stopped communicating.
Devon Whitham v Brutalitees Limited and Christine Dawson [2026] NZERA 325 - tattoo and piercing apprentice was an employee, not a contractor

Devon Whitham entered a tattoo and piercing apprenticeship that Brutalitees described as unpaid and contractor-like despite exercising close control over her work. The case concerned her true employment status, unpaid work and the heated meeting at which the relationship ended.

Matched passage: That produced total wages of $10,417.
Arnold Putt v George Weston Foods [2026] NZERA 179 - misconduct, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

Packaging operator Arnold Putt challenged disciplinary action by George Weston Foods after a confrontation with his production manager about task priorities. The ERA examined both the basis for a final written warning and whether shortcomings in the way the process was communicated caused a separate disadvantage.

Matched passage: Leave and pay complaints failed: The Authority did not accept that GWF acted unfairly by failing to automatically pay sick leave for the initial period of absence before the relevant medical certificate was supplied.
RMD v LWQ [2025] NZERA 535 - no dismissal; employment ended by mutual agreement

RMD claimed she had been dismissed by LWQ and also relied on allegations said to amount to protected disclosures. The ERA examined the communications surrounding the end of employment and whether the alleged disclosures met the statutory requirements for protected-disclosure treatment.

Matched passage: Decision markers In their absence, The Authority concluded it is more likely than not that RMD does not in fact have any contemporaneous evidential support that would suggest she truly believed her employment with LWQ continued after her last wages payment on 20 February 2024.
LAZARO v WAIMEA CONTRACT CARRIERS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 472 - no dismissal at December meeting; later termination and notice addressed

Mr Lazaro said Waimea Contract Carriers dismissed him at a 4 December meeting; the employer said he was merely suspended on full pay while training and other options were considered, and that employment ended later after he refused to return.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Notice pay: $44,000 Costs: Costs reserved.
PAETZ v SOLLY'S FREIGHT (1978) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 319 - The Authority found a constructive dismissal was established.

Mr Paetz resigned from Solly's Freight after disputes about excessive hours and the employer's failure to conduct a required pay review. He argued those ongoing breaches caused his resignation and also independently disadvantaged him while employed.

Matched passage: Conclusion on personal grievances [76] Mr Paetz has established personal grievances for unjustified action causing disadvantage in connection with Solly's requiring him to work more than 40 hours per week and Solly's failing to review his pay as required in the IEA.

Browse topics