ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 25-32 of 166 results
Siddanth Prasad & Ors v Fiji Food Distributors NZ Limited [2025] NZERA 659 - wage arrears, unjustified dismissal and $32,000 compensation each

Four Krazy Price Mart employees said they routinely worked about 60 hours over six days while being paid for substantially fewer hours and were later dismissed when the business was sold without adequate consultation. The case combined personal grievances with extensive minimum-entitlement claims.

Matched passage: Compensation and contribution The Authority accepted evidence of significant financial, physical and emotional harm from the long hours, underpayment and eventual dismissals.
Briar Leckie v Alliance Group Limited [2020] NZERA 221 - unjustified suspension and induced resignation treated as dismissal; $15,000 compensation; reimbursement reserved

Briar Leckie was suspended by Alliance Group after a workplace incident involving another employee and later left the employment in circumstances she said had been induced by the employer's handling of the matter. The case focused on the lack of inquiry before suspension and the reliability of the material used against her.

Matched passage: Contribution can reduce remedies: employee blameworthy conduct can lead to a percentage reduction, even if the employer acted unjustifiably.
Employment Services Limited v Resink [2026] NZEmpC 186 - constructive dismissal upheld

Employment Services pursued serious-misconduct allegations without adequately identifying them or providing requested information. Its unagreed visit to Frank Resink's home to recover a company vehicle became the last straw in continuing breaches of good faith.

Matched passage: The constructive-dismissal finding and ERA remedies were confirmed without any contribution reduction.
Fatima Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare Centre Inc [2026] NZERA 585 - performance dismissal lacked objective assessment

Minimarc Childcare dismissed ECE teacher Fatima Fahmy for performance after its centre manager remained the principal evaluator despite known relationship and bullying complaints. The ERA found the assessment was not sufficiently objective and ordered reinstatement, lost wages and $25,000 compensation.

Matched passage: Contribution: no reduction.
Sheridan v Pact Group [2026] NZEmpC 51 - medical incapacity dismissal overturned

Roseanne Sheridan developed PTSD after a serious threat from a resident at work and was dismissed for medical incapacity about six months later. Specialist ACC information and rehabilitation planning were still developing, and a return-to-work process had not been completed.

Matched passage: No reduction was made for contribution because the alleged blameworthy failure to provide medical information was not established.
Gumbeze v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZEmpC 133 - serious misconduct finding overturned

Oranga Tamariki summarily dismissed social worker Bigson Gumbeze after an external investigation into complaints about his supervision, dealings with managers and aspects of his practice. The ERA upheld the dismissal, but he challenged that result afresh in the Employment Court.

Matched passage: ... unjustified Lost remuneration: $79,015 gross - one year's salary Compensation: $35,000 Contribution: no reduction What the Authority had decided Mr Gumbeze was a care and protection social worker who was summarily dismissed in 2017 after an external investigation into ...
Sione Afimeimounga v NPD Limited [2026] NZERA 506 - tanker driver constructively and unjustifiably dismissed

Tanker driver Sione Afimeimounga repeatedly raised workload, scheduling and health-and-safety concerns that NPD failed to resolve. After he resigned on extended notice, the employer suspended and summarily dismissed him over selected comments from a provocative text exchange with another driver.

Matched passage: The case also confirms that accepting paid leave does not automatically cure an unjustified suspension and that an employee must be heard by the person who actually decides their employment will end.
Sukhmanpreet Singh v JIT Limited, Davinder Pal and Harmanpreet Kaur Sandhu [2026] NZERA 453 - forced leave request, unjustified suspension and dismissal

Sukhmanpreet Singh's dispute with JIT arose after he was pressed to submit an annual-leave request and a confrontation followed. JIT then cancelled his shifts on claimed mental-stress grounds and later dismissed him for serious misconduct, while the ERA examined the conduct of both sides.

Matched passage: Remedies and contribution Mr Singh was awarded lost remuneration for 13 weeks, calculated on the 30-hour weekly roster at $30 per hour, with earnings from later work deducted and 8 percent holiday pay added.

Browse topics