ClickCease

Results for disciplinary

Showing 25-32 of 108 results
BRENNAN v STELLA 2020 LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 449 - dismissal without fair process; compensation and lost wages

Ms Brennan's employment with Stella 2020 ended on 30 July 2024 without a fair disciplinary or dismissal process. The employer did not participate effectively in the ERA investigation, which proceeded on the evidence available to the Authority.

STEWART v OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED (3265479), OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED v STEWART (3275619) [2025] NZERA 330 - summary dismissal unjustified; 100% contribution removes lost wages

Open Country Dairy summarily dismissed Mr Stewart on the final day covered by his medical certificate after a disciplinary process. The ERA considered both the employer's process and Mr Stewart's own conduct when assessing justification and remedies.

STEWART v PULSE 2012 LIMITED t/a BROWNE ST [2025] NZERA 241 - dismissal unjustified; compensation reduced 17.5% for contribution

Pulse 2012 dismissed Mr Stewart after alleging he had prepared food for himself at the workplace while recorded as working, in a dispute that also involved allegations of theft. The ERA examined whether the evidence and disciplinary response could justify dismissal.

The Board of Trustees v LGY [2026] NZEmpC 46 - interim reinstatement upheld on de novo challenge

A school Board challenged an ERA order temporarily reinstating LGY while the employee's substantive dismissal grievance remained unresolved. The employer relied on alleged serious misconduct, loss of trust and workplace relationship concerns to resist reinstatement.

Matched passage: Why interim reinstatement was maintained The Board relied on alleged serious misconduct involving school funds and on the effect a return might have on workplace relationships and third parties.
Sinclair-Walker v Alert Monitoring Otago (1994) Limited [2026] NZERA 29 - unjustified dismissal; $25,000 compensation and $16,900 lost remuneration

Alert Monitoring dismissed Carl Sinclair-Walker for alleged serious misconduct after raising three concerns about his work performance. The ERA examined whether those concerns and the process used could justify immediate termination.

Matched passage: Story in plain English Mr Sinclair-Walker was dismissed for alleged serious misconduct after performance concerns were raised.
LMN v STC [2026] NZEmpC 137 - unauthorised reference checks and medical leave caused unjustified disadvantage

The Employment Court found two unjustified disadvantages in a long-running school employment dispute: former employers listed on LMN's CV were contacted without authority while her grievances were being investigated, and medical certificates were not properly recognised when dealing with her leave. Most of LMN's wider claims failed.

Matched passage: Employers should not assume that an old CV or reference list authorises fresh contact for a disciplinary or grievance purpose.
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: There was no disciplinary or redundancy process, no consultation, no opportunity to respond and no fair notice of an employment decision.

Browse topics