ClickCease

Results for 90 day trial

Showing 25-32 of 295 results
BALI v R1i TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 409 - Webex dismissal without fair process

R1i Technology dismissed Mr Bali during a Webex meeting and then confirmed the decision in writing. The employer did not participate in the ERA proceeding and the evidence showed no meaningful process satisfying the minimum statutory tests of procedural fairness.

Matched passage: 00 Holiday pay: $4,166.
DUN TRAN v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 73 - dismissal and employment-entitlement claims partly successful

Dun Tran's employment dispute with Huynh involved the ending of the employment relationship together with claims about pay and workplace treatment. The ERA had to separate the dismissal issue from the employment-standard claims and determine which alleged breaches were actually established.

Matched passage: ... (Wellington) Determination date: 14 February 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal found; 90-day trial defence rejected; remedies ordered. Story in plain English This decision deals with a dismissal during what the employer said was a 90-day trial period, and the remedies ...
TRANG BUI v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 72 - dismissal and employment-entitlement claims partly successful

Trang Bui worked in a small hospitality business where the parties disputed pay, working arrangements and the circumstances in which her employment ended. The ERA considered dismissal and disadvantage claims alongside minimum employment entitlement issues.

Matched passage: ... (Wellington) Determination date: 14 February 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal found; 90-day trial defence rejected; remedies ordered. Story in plain English This decision deals with a dismissal during what the employer said was a 90-day trial period, and the remedies ...
Angus Jowitt v Gokula Music Limited [2026] NZERA 297 - music shop worker dismissed by text after coffee dispute; wage arrears, holidays, compensation and penalties ordered

Angus Jowitt worked in a music shop under a disputed contractor-or-employee arrangement and was paid cash below the rate the employer accepted had been agreed. After a conflict over work and coffee, the employer later relied on resignation rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Mr Masson also referred to the arrangement as a kind of trial period.
LAZARO v WAIMEA CONTRACT CARRIERS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 472 - no dismissal at December meeting; later termination and notice addressed

Mr Lazaro said Waimea Contract Carriers dismissed him at a 4 December meeting; the employer said he was merely suspended on full pay while training and other options were considered, and that employment ended later after he refused to return.

Matched passage: In the end, Ms McIntyre responded to this email with a letter the next day, 5 December 2023.
PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 425 - medical-incapacity dismissal and unsafe-work disadvantage

MOVE Freight dismissed Mr Putaanga for medical incapacity after a workplace accident and a lengthy period assessing his prospects of returning to full-time work. He also alleged the employer had failed to provide a safe workplace and that this caused unjustified disadvantage.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
LI v MASTER Z FOOD LIMITED [2025] NZERA 335 - WeChat evidence showed employer ended employment

Master Z Food said Ms Li resigned during an April 2023 meeting; Li said she was told the decision had already been made to dismiss her and she could merely work out the week. Contemporary WeChat messages were central to resolving who ended the employment.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
PAETZ v SOLLY'S FREIGHT (1978) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 319 - The Authority found a constructive dismissal was established.

Mr Paetz resigned from Solly's Freight after disputes about excessive hours and the employer's failure to conduct a required pay review. He argued those ongoing breaches caused his resignation and also independently disadvantaged him while employed.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.

Browse topics