ClickCease

Results for ERA

Showing 273-280 of 288 results
Andrew McFarlane v Stuff Limited [2026] NZERA 623 - redundancy selection and redeployment failures made dismissal unjustified

Stuff had genuine commercial reasons to restructure, but it failed to properly establish that Andrew McFarlane's existing role was surplus before making him compete for a substantially similar role. The ERA found the dismissal unjustified, criticised the contestable selection and redeployment process, and awarded $25,000 compensation plus $30,840.98 gross lost remuneration and holiday pay.

Matched passage: era.
James Honotapu v Atlas Fibrous Plaster Company Limited [2026] NZERA 587 - absenteeism dismissal followed an unfair process

Atlas had legitimate concerns about James Honotapu's persistent absenteeism, but did not warn him that a meeting could end in dismissal. The ERA found the dismissal unjustified and ordered $8,574 after reducing lost wages and compensation by 50 percent for contribution.

Matched passage: Employee Personal Grievance Case Form Read the full ERA determination (embedded) If the embedded PDF does not load, use the button below.
Edgecumbe Supermarket Ltd v Petersen [2026] NZEmpC 56 - ERA unjustified dismissal finding upheld

Mrs Petersen was immediately suspended after raising concerns about a work task, was required to leave her uniform behind and was threatened with trespass. The dispute was whether those actions objectively communicated that her employment was over.

Matched passage: Relationship to the ERA decision: ERA outcome upheld on de novo challenge.
Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker [2024] NZEmpC 69 - stay of ERA remedies refused

After Mr Parker succeeded in the ERA on bullying and constructive dismissal claims, Magnum Hire challenged the result in the Employment Court and sought a stay so the ERA remedies could not be enforced while the challenge was pending.

Matched passage: nz/judgments/decisions/"; } Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker [2024] NZEmpC 69 - stay of ERA remedies refused After Mr Parker succeeded in the Employment Relations Authority, Magnum Hire challenged the result and sought to stop the ERA remedies being enforced in the meantime.
Faitala and Vea v Pacific Island Business Development Trust [2026] NZEmpC 53 - disadvantage findings and remedies varied

Mr Faitala and Mrs Vea were made redundant by Pacific Island Business Development Trust during a flawed restructure. Their Employment Court challenge focused on pre-dismissal disadvantage during the process and the proper level of lost-remuneration and compensation remedies.

Matched passage: ... Citation: [2026] NZEmpC 53 Judge: Judge M S King Judgment date: 19 March 2026 Underlying ERA determination: Faitala v The Pacific Island Business Development Trust [2024] NZERA 403 ERA dismissal outcome: unjustified redundancies - not challenged Employment Court change: ...
The Board of Trustees v LGY [2026] NZEmpC 46 - interim reinstatement upheld on de novo challenge

A school Board challenged an ERA order temporarily reinstating LGY while the employee's substantive dismissal grievance remained unresolved. The employer relied on alleged serious misconduct, loss of trust and workplace relationship concerns to resist reinstatement.

Matched passage: Relationship to the ERA decision: Interim ERA result upheld on de novo challenge.
Gumbeze v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZEmpC 133 - serious misconduct finding overturned

Oranga Tamariki summarily dismissed social worker Bigson Gumbeze after an external investigation into complaints about his supervision, dealings with managers and aspects of his practice. The ERA upheld the dismissal, but he challenged that result afresh in the Employment Court.

Matched passage: ... [2024] NZEmpC 133 Judge: Judge K G Smith Judgment date: 24 July 2024 Underlying liability ERA determination: Gumbeze v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [2022] NZERA 232 Underlying costs determination: [2022] NZERA 312 ERA outcome: dismissal justified Employment Court ...

Browse topics