ClickCease

Results for unjustified dismissal

Showing 249-256 of 325 results
No Win No Fee Employment Lawyer NZ | Personal Grievance & Dismissal Help

Employee-side no-win-no-fee employment advocacy for suitable personal-grievance, dismissal and redundancy cases, including mediation and ERA representation where the case meets the acceptance criteria.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal Employees commonly search for a no win no fee unfair dismissal lawyer after being dismissed for misconduct, performance, medical incapacity, absence, restructuring or another stated reason.
HILL v TAMAKI LABOUR HIRE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 100 - personal grievance partly successful; remedies limited to proven breaches

Mr Hill challenged the ending of his employment with Tamaki Labour Hire and associated treatment during the employment relationship. The case required the ERA to separate the parts of his grievance that were established from claims for which the evidence did not justify relief.

Matched passage: Decision markers Ms Hill has established she had a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
Disciplinary meetings: employee rights and common employer mistakes

Employee rights at a disciplinary meeting: clear allegations, relevant information, representation, time to prepare, a genuine opportunity to answer and an open-minded decision-maker.

Matched passage: If we don't attend the meeting then I say "when you're fired, come back to us", and I also stress that you record the meeting, take notes, ask questions, and don't agree to anything.
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: The Employment Relations Authority found that from 23 September 2024 he was an employee and that telling him his services were no longer required without any process was an unjustified dismissal.
Fatima Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare Centre Inc [2026] NZERA 585 - performance dismissal lacked objective assessment

Minimarc Childcare dismissed ECE teacher Fatima Fahmy for performance after its centre manager remained the principal evaluator despite known relationship and bullying complaints. The ERA found the assessment was not sufficiently objective and ordered reinstatement, lost wages and $25,000 compensation.

Matched passage: The failure to do that made the performance dismissal unjustified.
Nirali Bhatt v Prishal Limited, Utkarsh Deota and Vishal Patel [2026] NZERA 492 - unpaid wages caused unjustified disadvantage

Nirali Bhatt moved from India to work for Prishal Limited at Juice Heist and later raised concerns that she was not being paid in full. The case involved disputed hours, deficient wage and time records and whether continuing underpayment after complaint caused a personal grievance as well as arrears.

Matched passage: The determination did not find an unjustified dismissal.
RMD v LWQ [2025] NZERA 535 - no dismissal; employment ended by mutual agreement

RMD claimed she had been dismissed by LWQ and also relied on allegations said to amount to protected disclosures. The ERA examined the communications surrounding the end of employment and whether the alleged disclosures met the statutory requirements for protected-disclosure treatment.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 535 Registry: Christchurch Parties: RMD v LWQ Authority member: Claire English Hearing date: 17, 18, and 19 June 2025 in Nelson and by AVL (3 days) Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
LAZARO v WAIMEA CONTRACT CARRIERS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 472 - no dismissal at December meeting; later termination and notice addressed

Mr Lazaro said Waimea Contract Carriers dismissed him at a 4 December meeting; the employer said he was merely suspended on full pay while training and other options were considered, and that employment ended later after he refused to return.

Matched passage: ... date: 5 and 13 February 2025 (2 days) Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). In summary, Mr ...

Browse topics