ClickCease

Results for unpaid wages

Showing 241-248 of 279 results
Arnold Putt v George Weston Foods [2026] NZERA 179 - misconduct, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

Packaging operator Arnold Putt challenged disciplinary action by George Weston Foods after a confrontation with his production manager about task priorities. The ERA examined both the basis for a final written warning and whether shortcomings in the way the process was communicated caused a separate disadvantage.

Matched passage: Leave and pay complaints failed: The Authority did not accept that GWF acted unfairly by failing to automatically pay sick leave for the initial period of absence before the relevant medical certificate was supplied.
The Estate of Samuel Keast v Playground Centre Limited [2026] NZERA 136 - preliminary decision: estate could not raise a new personal grievance after death; Australian entity was employer at the time; ERA lacked jurisdiction

After Samuel Keast died while working in Melbourne, his estate sought to pursue employment claims, including constructive dismissal, against a New Zealand company. The preliminary issue was whether a personal grievance existed before his death, who employed him in Australia, and whether the ERA had jurisdiction over the named respondent.

Matched passage: The estate also pointed to general workplace dissatisfaction (including concerns about colleagues, workload, and pay).
Jasmine Woollett v Commissioner of Police [2026] NZERA 53 - Fiji deployment recall and unfair process; $21,000 compensation

Senior Sergeant Jasmine Woollett challenged decisions surrounding her Fiji deployment, including her recall and the process Police used after her working relationship with a deployment manager deteriorated. Her claim was for unjustified disadvantage rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Remedies and orders The Authority made the following key orders (payable within 28 days): Police must pay $21,000 compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity, and injury to feelings (within 28 days).
CAMERON ROWETH v MT OUTDOORS LIMITED [2026] NZERA 50 - redundancy dismissal held unjustified due to no consultation on selection; $15,000 compensation, $5,400 lost remuneration, $1,800 notice

Mt Outdoors terminated seasonal retail worker Cameron Roweth's fixed-term role early when winter trading was weaker than expected. The business had a genuine need to reduce labour costs, but selected him for redundancy without consulting him about the selection decision.

Matched passage: The employer had paid only two weeks, so the Authority ordered an additional two weeks' notice pay of $1,800.
Jingkai Wang v Envoco Limited [2025] NZERA 845 - resignation, covert recordings and limited unjustified disadvantage

Jingkai Wang claimed Envoco had dismissed him and subjected him to bullying and an unsafe workplace, while the employer said he resigned. The evidence also included covert recordings and a trial clause signed only after work had begun.

Matched passage: That limited failure resulted in a $2,000 award reduced by 25% for contribution, leaving $1,500 payable.
LGY v Board of Trustees [2025] NZERA 809 - interim reinstatement ordered pending dismissal grievance (non-publication)

LGY sought interim reinstatement after being dismissed by a school board while the substantive personal grievance remained unresolved. The Board relied on serious allegations and workplace concerns, while LGY argued there was a strong arguable dismissal case and that reinstatement could operate pending a final hearing.

Matched passage: The decision records that LGY acknowledged the school had paid for WOW tickets for her family in 2023, and said she had wrongly treated that cost as "offset" by personal fundraising expenses she had not claimed.
Invalid trial period clause, no process, and wage record failures - Shania Mortimer v Auckland Steam 'N' Dry Limited [2025] NZERA 808; $30,087.30 ordered (lost remuneration and distress compensation)

Shania Mortimer was dismissed by Auckland Steam 'N' Dry under a purported trial period. The dispute concerned whether the trial clause was legally effective, whether any dismissal process occurred, and the employer's wage and record-keeping compliance.

Matched passage: Orders and payments $30,087.
OCO v ZUA [2025] NZERA 790 - Constructive dismissal after unfair suspension and defective disciplinary process

OCO resigned after being suspended and put through a disciplinary process by ZUA. The case centred on whether the suspension and investigation were fair and whether the employer's cumulative conduct was serious enough to make the resignation a constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Reimbursement: $11,868.

Browse topics