ClickCease

Results for warnings

Showing 17-23 of 23 results
Menzies v Corrigan [2025] NZEmpC 186 - employment advocate and employment lawyer conduct

Menzies v Corrigan concerned an ERA compliance order that required a company director personally to take steps to fund a liquidated employer so grievance remedies could be paid. The challenge raised questions about s 137(2), separate corporate personality and the reach of compliance jurisdiction.

Matched passage: By December 2024 this was therefore not just a generic warning that imprisonment existed somewhere in the Act.
Christmas party misconduct: when employers can discipline or dismiss

Employment-law lessons from misconduct at Christmas parties and other work functions, including alcohol, off-duty conduct, investigations and when discipline or dismissal may be justified.

Matched passage: Prior to dismissal K had spoken to the other employees assuring them they would be fine and could only expect a warning.
Urgent Employment Law Advice for Employers NZ | Dismissal and Suspension

Urgent employer guidance for situations where dismissal or suspension is being considered and an immediate decision could create a personal grievance or destroy useful evidence.

Matched passage: Atkins v Alpine 182 Degrees Ltd [2023] NZERA 334 - management conduct can become the emergency Atkins is a warning for employers where the urgent problem is driven by a manager's conduct.
Employment Mediation for Employers NZ | Settlement Strategy and s 149 Terms

How employers should prepare for MBIE employment mediation: case assessment, documents, settlement range, negotiation strategy, Calderbank offers and precise s 149 settlement terms.

Matched passage: Zhang v Ford Steel Engineering Ltd [2025] NZERA 741 - draft express terms rather than relying on implication Zhang is a practical drafting warning.
Disciplinary Investigations for Employers NZ | Misconduct and Complaints

Employer guide to disciplinary investigations: framing allegations, preserving evidence, interviewing witnesses, disclosure, representation and keeping the investigation separate from the final disciplinary decision.

Matched passage: Mulqueen v The Merino Story (NZ) Ltd [2023] NZERA 329 - verify the complaint before relying on it Mulqueen is a practical warning.
90 Day Trial Periods for Employers NZ | Clause, Notice and PG Risk

Employer checklist for using a 90-day trial period: drafting the clause, signing before work starts, calculating the period, giving termination notice and avoiding defects that can revive a personal grievance.

Matched passage: Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy (2009) Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 111 - strict interpretation Smith is the foundation warning.

Browse topics