ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 225-232 of 290 results
LAZARO v WAIMEA CONTRACT CARRIERS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 472 - no dismissal at December meeting; later termination and notice addressed

Mr Lazaro said Waimea Contract Carriers dismissed him at a 4 December meeting; the employer said he was merely suspended on full pay while training and other options were considered, and that employment ended later after he refused to return.

Matched passage: ... colleagues abused him and the WCC trainers harassed him. Ultimately, The Authority's investigation [8] I investigated this employment relationship problem by receiving written evidence and documents, holding an investigation meeting on 5 February 2025 and 13 February ...
PETERSEN v EDGECUMBE SUPERMARKET LIMITED [2025] NZERA 473 - told to leave and surrender uniform amounted to dismissal

Edgecumbe Supermarket said Mrs Petersen was merely suspended after refusing an instruction and that her employment was going to end anyway because of overseas travel. Petersen said she was told to leave, surrender her uniform and was threatened with trespass, which objectively conveyed that she had been fired.

Matched passage: ... management conference was delivered to the employer's registered address and notice of the investigation meeting was served on Mr Gorrie, as was a copy of Mrs Petersen's evidence and an administrative email about arrangements for the investigation meeting. Later, As a result ...
RAINA v HALL'S REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 469 - disciplinary process and dismissal procedurally unfair

Mr Raina faced disciplinary action by Hall's Refrigerated Transport, including a meeting invitation that did not tell him he could bring a support person and a generic warning that dismissal was possible. The case concerned both disadvantage during the process and the justification for the eventual termination.

Matched passage: The Authority's Investigation [5] On 31 January 2024, I held a case management conference with the representatives to set a timetable for Mr Raina's claims for unjustified disadvantage and unjustified dismissal.
Wang v Steel Master Co Ltd [2025] NZERA 457 - dismissal, not resignation; $11,000 compensation and 8 weeks lost wages

Steel Master said Mr Wang had resigned, but he had been given a choice between finding another job and being unilaterally dismissed. The ERA examined the objective effect of that ultimatum rather than the employer's description of the ending.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 457 Registry: Auckland Authority member: Helen van Druten Investigation meeting: 28 April 2025 Main outcome: Dismissal, not resignation; unjustified dismissal established.
HAI ZHENG v JCD NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 453 - constructive dismissal; compensation and penalty

Hai Zheng's employment dispute with JCD concerned whether he had resigned or whether employer breaches caused his departure, together with associated disadvantage and contractual claims. The ERA examined whether the employer's conduct made resignation a reasonably foreseeable consequence.

Matched passage: The Authority's investigation [6] JCD director George Zhang attended an Authority case management conference on 26 November 2024 which set timetable directions for both parties to lodge witness statements and relevant documents.
LEBRETON v DA HAI INVESTMENT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 451 - Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded).

Da Hai Investment treated Ms LeBreton as a casual worker despite an ongoing pattern of part-time work and an original offer suggesting minimum hours. The dispute covered the true status of the relationship, how it ended, sick leave, lost remuneration and statutory breaches.

Matched passage: After that, A further directions teleconference was held on 14 March and witness evidence exchanges were timetabled and an investigation meeting was scheduled for 27 May 2025.
TYACK v BIG B CARTAGE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 436 - text was not resignation; employer later dismissed employee

Big B Cartage said Mr Tyack had resigned by text, while Tyack maintained he had not and later attempted to return after a period of medical incapacity. The case turned on who actually ended the employment relationship and whether the employer could rely on the alleged resignation.

Matched passage: After that, However, during the investigation meeting and beforehand at a teleconference the Authority directed Mr Sims to provide the original text exchanges of 2 August 2023 he sought to rely upon but Mr Sims indicated that he was unable to recover the full text exchanges.
ZHENG v BOYA TRADING LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 427 - dismissal by text was not abandonment

Boya Trading summarily dismissed Mr Zheng by text on 26 May 2023, alleging that he had refused to work and abandoned his employment. Mr Zheng said there had been no warning or consultation and raised dismissal and disadvantage grievances the following month.

Matched passage: In the end, On the Authority's usual tariff for an investigation meeting, for a full day of investigation meeting time, the appropriate order of costs is $4,500.

Browse topics