ClickCease

Results for dismissal process

Showing 209-216 of 270 results
Thomas Patrick Kenna v Anztec Limited [2026] NZERA 120 - redundancy found genuine but consultation defective; unjustified disadvantage; $15,000 compensation

Thomas Kenna was made redundant from Anztec after a restructuring that the ERA accepted had a genuine business basis. He challenged alleged predetermination and the employer's failure to proactively disclose information needed to understand and respond to the proposal.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Thomas Patrick Kenna v Anztec Limited [2026] NZERA 120 A redundancy case where the Employment Relations Authority accepted the role became surplus for genuine business reasons, but found the consultation and good faith process was not fair.
PENNY v FRELLO LIMITED [2025] NZERA 317 - redundancy consultation and redeployment failures

Henry Penny was selected for redundancy from Frello's software-development team after a restructure intended to reduce headcount. He argued resignations had already reduced staff numbers, the selection outcome was predetermined, and consultation and redeployment were not genuine.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 317 Registry: Wellington Parties: PENNY v FRELLO LIMITED Authority member: Sarah Kennedy-Martin Hearing date: 4 March 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
Singh v McKee [2026] NZEmpC 146 - Employment Court increased PG compensation from $8,000 to $15,000

The Employment Court left the ERA's unchallenged finding of unjustified redundancy dismissal in place but increased compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings from $8,000 to $15,000. The judgment is useful guidance on evidence of emotional harm and the updated compensation bands.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Singh v McKee [2026] NZEmpC 146 - Employment Court increased PG compensation from $8,000 to $15,000 Mr Singh had already succeeded in the Authority on an unjustified dismissal arising from a truncated and incomplete redundancy process.
Ben Devine v Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora [2025] NZERA 206 - nurse's 'casual' status rejected; unpaid stand-down unjustified disadvantage; reinstatement ordered; $15,000 compensation plus lost wages

Ben Devine had historically held permanent nursing hours but Health New Zealand later relied on documents describing part of his work as casual and left him on an unpaid stand-down. The case concerned the real nature of the employment relationship and whether the employer could remove work and pay without a proper process.

Matched passage: The combination of unilateral action, lack of process, and the duration of being left without pay and without an investigation was held to be an unjustified disadvantage.
Disciplinary Meetings and Investigations
7 articles

Facing a disciplinary meeting or misconduct allegation? The employer should investigate properly, identify the allegations and evidence, give a genuine opportunity to respond, and keep an open mind before deciding on a warning or dismissal.

Continue
Election 2026: Labour and Opportunity Asked About the 2026 Employment Law Changes

Ahead of the 2026 election, Labour and Opportunity were asked to state their positions on the recent Employment Relations Act changes, including contribution, remedies and employee access to justice.

Matched passage: The 2026 Amendment Act made a package of changes affecting personal grievances, remedies, dismissal rights, employee status and collective bargaining.

Browse topics