ClickCease

Results for unjustified dismissal

Showing 201-208 of 274 results
Yang (Helen) Feng v Dong Construction and Dong Wang [2026] NZERA 132 - trial-period defence fails; dismissal and entitlement breaches established

Yang (Helen) Feng worked for Dong Construction in circumstances involving a disputed trial period and claims for unpaid employment entitlements. The ERA examined whether the trial clause could lawfully prevent a dismissal grievance and what wages or other payments remained owing.

Matched passage: (l) Does the Authority have jurisdiction over Ms Feng's unjustified dismissal grievance?
CHASE-PONA v COIN TOTAL WELLINGTON LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 428 - dismissed during notice period; constructive dismissal in alternative

Mr Chase-Pona resigned after workplace disputes including a theft allegation, but Coin Total terminated his employment before his notice period expired. The ERA had to determine whether the employment ended by resignation, dismissal or constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 428 Registry: Wellington Parties: CHASE-PONA v COIN TOTAL WELLINGTON LIMITED and Anor Authority member: Geoff O'Sullivan Hearing date: 23 April 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
DUN TRAN v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 73 - dismissal and employment-entitlement claims partly successful

Dun Tran's employment dispute with Huynh involved the ending of the employment relationship together with claims about pay and workplace treatment. The ERA had to separate the dismissal issue from the employment-standard claims and determine which alleged breaches were actually established.

Matched passage: ... meeting: 9-12 September 2024 (Wellington) Determination date: 14 February 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal found; 90-day trial defence rejected; remedies ordered. Story in plain English This decision deals with a dismissal during what the employer said was a 90-day trial ...
O'BRIEN v THE PLATFORM MEDIA NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 56 - disadvantage claims decided; later dismissal claims left separate

Ms O'Brien's proceeding against The Platform concerned employment grievances arising before her later dismissal. After the investigation meeting she sought to add dismissal-related claims, creating a procedural dispute about whether those new matters belonged in the determination already under way.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: NZERA 56 Registry: Wellington Parties: O'BRIEN v THE PLATFORM MEDIA NZ LIMITED Authority member: nan Hearing date: nan Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
CULLY v THE WORK SHOP LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2025] NZERA 507 - constructive-dismissal and wage claims; $12,000 ordered

Mr Cully resigned from The Work Shop Limited and alleged the employer's breaches were serious enough to amount to constructive dismissal. He also sought unpaid wages and compensation, requiring the ERA to determine whether his resignation was legally attributable to the employer's conduct.

Matched passage: Accordingly The Authority found that his claim for unjustified (constructive) dismissal is made out on these grounds.
XU v ABHYUDAYA LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 502 - genuine redundancy but process unjustified

Architectural technician Ms Xu was told her role was redundant during a downturn in work. The employer had genuine commercial reasons to reduce staffing, but the decision was communicated without meaningful consultation beforehand.

Matched passage: The Authority found the redundancy decision had a genuine business basis, but the dismissal was procedurally unjustified due to inadequate consultation.
Jasmine Woollett v Commissioner of Police [2026] NZERA 53 - Fiji deployment recall and unfair process; $21,000 compensation

Senior Sergeant Jasmine Woollett challenged decisions surrounding her Fiji deployment, including her recall and the process Police used after her working relationship with a deployment manager deteriorated. Her claim was for unjustified disadvantage rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Recall from Fiji: The Authority found the decision was procedurally unjustified because Police failed to consult Ms Woollett before deciding to repatriate and denied her a meaningful chance to influence decisions about ongoing allowances.
Singh v McKee [2026] NZEmpC 146 - Employment Court increased PG compensation from $8,000 to $15,000

The Employment Court left the ERA's unchallenged finding of unjustified redundancy dismissal in place but increased compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings from $8,000 to $15,000. The judgment is useful guidance on evidence of emotional harm and the updated compensation bands.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Singh v McKee [2026] NZEmpC 146 - Employment Court increased PG compensation from $8,000 to $15,000 Mr Singh had already succeeded in the Authority on an unjustified dismissal arising from a truncated and incomplete redundancy process.

Browse topics