ClickCease

Results for dismissal process

Showing 201-204 of 204 results
Cameron Rix v Rotorua Quarry Limited [2025] NZERA 152 - The Authority found the employee was unjustifiably dismissed (abandonment was not made out) and awarded remedies.

Rotorua Quarry treated Cameron Rix's absence as abandonment and ended his employment. The ERA had to decide whether his conduct showed an intention to permanently walk away from the job and whether the employer was entitled to terminate on that basis.

Matched passage: It follows therefore he cannot have contributed to his dismissal in a blameworthy manner.
PAYNE and Ors v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES and Anor [2025] NZERA 79 - Preliminary strike-out (settlement/estoppel) issues

A group of MPI employees sought to pursue claims arising from roster and restructure changes despite earlier litigation and a mediated settlement. The preliminary determination addressed whether the claims were barred by the certified settlement, estoppel or the Authority's jurisdiction.

Matched passage: Ultimately, PSA Meeting Minutes of 30 June 2021 refer to the legal team's view that MPI can move staff legally under the change process.
KNOX v RECRUIT IT GROUP LIMITED [2025] NZERA 4 - redundancy rationale and consultation failed scrutiny

Recruit IT Group made Mr Knox's consultant role redundant shortly before another staff member was promoted into a consultant position. Mr Knox argued the redundancy rationale, consultation timeframe and claimed lack of redeployment options did not withstand scrutiny.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 4 Registry: Wellington Parties: KNOX v RECRUIT IT GROUP LIMITED Authority member: Davinnia Tan Hearing date: 13 November 2024 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
Nicholas Fry v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2026] NZERA 116 - FENZ identity-promise breach caused disadvantage; $13,000 compensation

Nicholas Fry's dispute with Fire and Emergency New Zealand arose from FireSuper membership and a promise about protecting the identity of another person, TEP, whose eligibility he had raised. Mr Fry alleged FENZ broke that promise and that the resulting use of TEP's identity damaged his employment relationship.

Matched passage: In January 2024 Mr Fry discovered he had not been enrolled into the New Zealand Fire Service Superannuation Scheme (FireSuper).

Browse topics