ClickCease

Results for dismissal process

Showing 193-200 of 270 results
Aiga Faamanu Roache v Landcorp Farming Limited t/a Pamu [2026] NZERA 55 - redundancy restructure held unjustified; $18,000 compensation and $8,900.15 lost wages

Aiga Faamanu Roache's Accounts Payable Team Leader role at Pamu was disestablished after automation reduced manual finance processing. The ERA examined whether Pamu had actually explained why her leadership role was surplus, allowed meaningful consultation and handled redeployment properly.

Matched passage: ... (ERA) determination about a redundancy restructure and whether the employer followed a fair process and had a genuine and justified basis to disestablish the employee's role. At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 55 Registry: Wellington Authority member: Sarah Kennedy-Martin ...
Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51)

Cook Mark Beveridge was told to 'bugger off' and leave the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn during a confrontation connected with police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property. The employer disputed whether those words had actually ended the employment.

Matched passage: Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51) A cook was told to 'bugger off' and leave the premises amid police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property.
Julie Curtis v Affordable UK Caravans and Parts Limited [2026] NZERA 46 - constructive dismissal after employer refused wages and delayed return; $25,000 compensation

Julie Curtis had a regular 20-hour week with Affordable UK Caravans when the employer told her there was no work until mid-January and refused to pay her contracted hours. She treated the prolonged exclusion from paid work as a serious breach and resigned.

Matched passage: Repudiation and constructive dismissal: refusing to provide work and refusing to pay contracted wages was a serious breach and repudiatory conduct.
BLIGNAUT v WASTE MANAGEMENT NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 560 - The personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage was upheld.

Mr Blignaut challenged Waste Management's treatment of him during a workplace conflict, including alleged bullying, suspension and pressure to resign, before he was ultimately dismissed for alleged serious misconduct. The ERA considered both the pre-dismissal disadvantage claims and the termination itself.

Matched passage: The determination records that WMNZ starts a disciplinary process [79] On 14 December 2023 Mr Singh sent an email to Mr Blignaut attaching a letter requesting a meeting on 15 December 2023, for when Mr Blignaut was expected to return to work.
Covid-19 Response Vaccinations Legislation Act 2021: vaccination and employment law

A historical guide to the Covid-19 vaccination employment framework, including paid vaccination time, notice provisions and the process issues that arose when vaccination requirements affected employment.

Matched passage: Personal grievance rights to bring a grievance for unjustifiable dismissal will be unaffected by these changes.
Raheel Reddy v Studio Image Limited [2026] NZERA 323 - barber dismissed by text message after lateness and attendance issues

Barber Raheel Reddy was dismissed by text after ongoing lateness and attendance concerns. Studio Image argued he had resigned or that termination was justified, but there had been no proper disciplinary process giving him a fair opportunity to answer the concerns.

Matched passage: Process is still required: lateness and attendance concerns must be investigated and put to the employee before dismissal.
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: It was accepted by SRL that in all the circumstances, this amounted to an unjustified dismissal.
LEVI-ADAMS v GREENE [2025] NZERA 531 - material withheld until after dismissal; dismissal unjustified

Ms Levi-Adams was dismissed by Greene after a process in which important material was not provided to her until after the termination decision. The ERA examined whether she had been given the information and opportunity to respond that a fair and reasonable employer was required to provide.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 531 Registry: Auckland Parties: LEVI-ADAMS v GREENE Authority member: Jeremy Lynch Hearing date: 13 November 2024, 13 August 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.

Browse topics