ClickCease

Results for unjustified dismissal

Showing 177-184 of 274 results
Angus Jowitt v Gokula Music Limited [2026] NZERA 297 - music shop worker dismissed by text after coffee dispute; wage arrears, holidays, compensation and penalties ordered

Angus Jowitt worked in a music shop under a disputed contractor-or-employee arrangement and was paid cash below the rate the employer accepted had been agreed. After a conflict over work and coffee, the employer later relied on resignation rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal remedies Lost wages: one month, $2,970 Mr Jowitt was entitled to consideration of lost wages because he had established a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
Invalid trial period clause, no process, and wage record failures - Shania Mortimer v Auckland Steam 'N' Dry Limited [2025] NZERA 808; $30,087.30 ordered (lost remuneration and distress compensation)

Shania Mortimer was dismissed by Auckland Steam 'N' Dry under a purported trial period. The dispute concerned whether the trial clause was legally effective, whether any dismissal process occurred, and the employer's wage and record-keeping compliance.

Matched passage: The Authority noted a fair and reasonable employer would normally train/support a new employee (particularly one in a first office role) and give feedback before dismissal.
Haochen Guo v Su's Investment Limited [2025] NZERA 805 - suspension without process, bullying, and redundancy while on ACC leave; $25,000 compensation plus arrears and penalty

Haochen Guo was suspended, complained of bullying and was later made redundant while absent on ACC leave. The ERA examined the fairness of the suspension and workplace treatment as well as whether the purported redundancy was genuine and properly consulted on.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Haochen Guo v Su's Investment Limited [2025] NZERA 805 This determination involves multiple personal grievances (unjustified disadvantage and unjustified dismissal) against Su's Investment Limited (SIL), trading as Coffee Studio.
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was made redundant from OH and N Contracting as forestry work reduced and no replacement contract had been secured. The ERA accepted there was a genuine business reason to reduce staff but examined whether the employer had consulted, disclosed information, considered alternatives and paid notice correctly.

Matched passage: Why the dismissal was unjustified The Authority concluded that OH & N had not shown that its actions, and how it acted in the lead-up to Mr Powell's termination, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in the circumstances.
Emily Barr v Brooker Travel Limited [2026] NZERA 651 - bullying complaint failures led to constructive dismissal

Emily Barr complained about repeated belittling and dismissive treatment by her manager. Brooker Travel obtained an external investigation but then failed to adequately protect her, disclose the final report or provide a workable return-to-work plan. The ERA found unjustified disadvantage and constructive dismissal, awarding $20,000 compensation and six months' lost wages with associated entitlements.

Matched passage: ... travel consultant Employment commenced: 10 November 2023 Resigned: 30 April 2025 Outcome: unjustified disadvantage and unjustified constructive dismissal Compensation: $20,000 Lost wages: $16,498.56 gross Holiday pay: $1,319.56, plus employer KiwiSaver contributions and ...
Ashleigh Sanders v Hamilton City Council [2026] NZERA 517 - senior zoo manager's insidious conduct caused unjustified disadvantage

Hamilton Zoo's former senior manager subjected zookeeper Ashleigh Sanders to intrusive personal contact, out-of-hours messages, requests for information about colleagues, favouritism and career-related pressure. She later resigned, long after that manager had left.

Matched passage: Because the dismissal claim failed, no lost-wages remedy was available.
Fire and Emergency New Zealand v Kinzett [2026] NZEmpC 119 - ERA dismissal finding overturned

Fire and Emergency New Zealand summarily dismissed Russell Kinzett following an investigation into conduct that included breaches of FENZ policies. The ERA held the dismissal unjustified, and FENZ brought a de novo challenge in the Employment Court.

Matched passage: The ERA had found the dismissal unjustified and ordered remedies.
Valerie Leech v Electrical Importing Co Limited [2026] NZERA 553 - employment was agreed before the 90-day trial was signed

Electrical Importing Co agreed Valerie Leech's core job terms and told her when to start before presenting a written employment agreement containing a 90-day trial clause. It later relied on that clause to dismiss her.

Matched passage: ... 18 October 2024 Determination date: 13 August 2026 Outcome: invalid trial period and unjustified dismissal Lost remuneration: $21,250 gross Compensation: $13,000 Total ordered: $34,250 Costs: reserved The job was offered before the agreement arrived Ms Leech interviewed ...

Browse topics