ClickCease

Results for lost wages

Showing 169-176 of 239 results
Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 - genuine redundancy but unjustified process

Neil Hall was made redundant from Consultex's Northland asbestos and mould work after a downturn that gave the employer a genuine reason to reduce headcount. The dispute centred on whether Consultex complied with its good-faith information and consultation obligations before choosing and implementing the redundancy.

Matched passage: Lost wages: none ordered because the claim was withdrawn before the determination.
Sophie Kennett v Polygon GY Developments Limited [2026] NZERA 405 - engineered resignation, redundancy and Holidays Act entitlements

Sophie Kennett resigned from Polygon GY Developments after a course of conduct she said was designed to force her out, in a context also involving a claimed redundancy and unpaid Holidays Act entitlements. The ERA examined the reality of the resignation rather than only its formal label.

Matched passage: ... for Holidays Act purposes; constructive dismissal; unjustified redundancy dismissal; unpaid wages and Holidays Act breaches Compensation: $19,000 Lost wages: $5,848.20 gross Notice pay: $3,898.80 gross, plus 3% KiwiSaver contributions Statutory entitlements: $2,657.85 ...
Rachel Hankins v Huhtamaki Henderson Limited [2026] NZERA 379 - valid fixed term but unjustified early termination

Rachel Hankins was employed by Huhtamaki Henderson on a fixed-term arrangement. Although the ERA accepted there was a valid basis for the fixed term itself, her employment was ended before the agreed expiry and the employer had to justify that early termination separately.

Matched passage: Orders Huhtamaki Henderson Limited was ordered to pay Rachel Hankins: Compensation for unjustified disadvantage: $3,500 for the premature removal of IT-system access.
Nata Venceslau Dos Santos v Nresh Group Limited [2026] NZERA 363 - hostile workplace, visa pressure, unjustified dismissal, wage arrears and penalties

Nata Venceslau Dos Santos described a hostile workplace in which visa-related pressure, pay issues and deteriorating treatment preceded the end of employment. The ERA considered dismissal alongside wage arrears and minimum employment-standard breaches.

Matched passage: ... Compensation: $25,000 total under section 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 Lost wages: $1,440 gross Contractual wage arrears: $2,698.15 gross Public holiday entitlements: time and a half and alternative holidays for Good Friday and ANZAC Day 2024 Interest: ...
Cameron Keen v Prestige Paving NZ Limited [2026] NZERA 344 - unjustified dismissal after employer stopped providing work and pay

Cameron Keen's work and pay with Prestige Paving stopped after the employer ceased providing him with work rather than carrying out a formal dismissal process. The ERA examined whether that practical exclusion from employment amounted to a dismissal and whether any justification existed.

Matched passage: For the period from 6 January 2025 to 14 February 2025, he claimed he was available for work for 40 days and would have been paid $5,939.
Sasha Lee v JNJ Management Limited and National Holdings Limited [2026] NZERA 309 - redundancy unjustified, duties removed without consultation, wage arrears and holiday pay ordered

Sasha Lee performed management, HR and operational work across JNJ group businesses before duties were removed and her position was later declared redundant. She challenged both the unilateral reduction of responsibilities and the redundancy process, together with wage and holiday-pay issues.

Matched passage: JNJ was therefore ordered to pay $17,500 compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000.
Phil Jacklin v Planit Software Testing Limited [2026] NZERA 264 - bonus clause held discretionary; KPI delay breached contract; $10,000 unjustified disadvantage award

Phil Jacklin argued that Planit Software Testing's short-term incentive clause guaranteed him a 25 percent bonus paid quarterly. The employer said the scheme was discretionary, while a separate issue concerned its failure to set KPIs and eligible amounts at the beginning of the financial year as promised.

Matched passage: He sought, among other remedies: Lost wages from the date of constructive dismissal to the determination date.
Courtney Jansen v BDS Chartered Accountants Limited [2026] NZERA 230 - 90 day trial phone termination + resignation option led to unjustified constructive dismissal; $7,000 compensation

Courtney Jansen was told by an external HR consultant that BDS Chartered Accountants would end her employment under a 90-day trial, but was offered the option of resigning instead. The case turned on whether choosing resignation in the face of an announced dismissal was truly voluntary.

Matched passage: Orders Compensation: BDS must pay Ms Jansen $7,000 under s 123(1)(c)(i), within 28 days of 20 April 2026.

Browse topics