ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 161-168 of 209 results
Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was made redundant by OH and N Contracting as forestry work wound down and no replacement work had been secured. The ERA accepted that business pressure was genuine but examined whether the employer consulted before deciding the redundancy and complied with notice and record obligations.

Matched passage: ... 5 May 2026 in Whanganui Determination date: 20 July 2026 Role: forestry worker Employment period: November 2022 to January 2025 Dismissal type: redundancy Business reason: genuine business information existed, but the process failed Dismissal: procedurally unjustified ...
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was made redundant from OH and N Contracting as forestry work reduced and no replacement contract had been secured. The ERA accepted there was a genuine business reason to reduce staff but examined whether the employer had consulted, disclosed information, considered alternatives and paid notice correctly.

Matched passage: ... in Whanganui Determination date: 20 July 2026 Role: site foreman in logging work Employment period: November 2022 to January 2025 Dismissal type: redundancy Business reason: genuine business information existed, but process failed Dismissal: procedurally unjustified ...
OAS v JIK Limited [2026] NZERA 474 - employee dismissed after seeking family violence leave

Chef OAS told JIK Limited he needed time away from work after family violence affecting his children, including meetings with victim support and steps toward a protection order. The employer treated his messages as resignation or abandonment and omitted him from the next roster.

Matched passage: JIK's decision not to put him on the next roster was a dismissal, and that dismissal was unjustified.
Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 - genuine redundancy but unjustified process

Neil Hall was made redundant from Consultex's Northland asbestos and mould work after a downturn that gave the employer a genuine reason to reduce headcount. The dispute centred on whether Consultex complied with its good-faith information and consultation obligations before choosing and implementing the redundancy.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 This Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination concerns the redundancy dismissal of Neil Hall, a Northland asbestos surveyor and certified mould-testing technician employed by Consultex Company Limited.
Sophie Kennett v Polygon GY Developments Limited [2026] NZERA 405 - engineered resignation, redundancy and Holidays Act entitlements

Sophie Kennett resigned from Polygon GY Developments after a course of conduct she said was designed to force her out, in a context also involving a claimed redundancy and unpaid Holidays Act entitlements. The ERA examined the reality of the resignation rather than only its formal label.

Matched passage: ... engineered resignation; continuity of employment; Holidays Act entitlements; constructive dismissal; redundancy arising from a business sale; redeployment; consultation; notice; unpaid wages; penalties and interest Findings: continuous employment for Holidays Act purposes; ...
Jeanette Go v Point Limited [2026] NZERA 369 - genuine redundancy but flawed consultation and undisclosed selection criteria

Point Limited made estimator Jeanette Go redundant after a genuine downturn in estimation work, but did not disclose its selection criteria, interview the other estimators or properly engage with her reduced-hours alternative before preparing the termination outcome.

Matched passage: Because the redundancy situation itself was genuine, the Authority considered lost wages were not usually awarded in the same way they may be after a disciplinary dismissal.
Devon Whitham v Brutalitees Limited and Christine Dawson [2026] NZERA 325 - tattoo and piercing apprentice was an employee, not a contractor

Devon Whitham entered a tattoo and piercing apprenticeship that Brutalitees described as unpaid and contractor-like despite exercising close control over her work. The case concerned her true employment status, unpaid work and the heated meeting at which the relationship ended.

Matched passage: There was no genuine consideration of any explanation before dismissal.
Sasha Lee v JNJ Management Limited and National Holdings Limited [2026] NZERA 309 - redundancy unjustified, duties removed without consultation, wage arrears and holiday pay ordered

Sasha Lee performed management, HR and operational work across JNJ group businesses before duties were removed and her position was later declared redundant. She challenged both the unilateral reduction of responsibilities and the redundancy process, together with wage and holiday-pay issues.

Matched passage: The ERA treated the allegation as serious and found that, if known while the employment relationship was still on foot, it could potentially have resulted in dismissal.

Browse topics