Suspension from Work
TopicSuspension is a serious step, not a punishment. An employer ordinarily needs a proper reason and fair process, and the suspension should last no longer than reasonably necessary for the investigation or risk being managed.
Search New Zealand employment-law guides, ERA determinations, Employment Court decisions and topics.
Results for unjustified disadvantage
Suspension is a serious step, not a punishment. An employer ordinarily needs a proper reason and fair process, and the suspension should last no longer than reasonably necessary for the investigation or risk being managed.
A performance improvement process should identify genuine performance gaps, set clear and reasonable expectations, provide appropriate support and a real opportunity to improve before dismissal is considered.
Workplace bullying is repeated and unreasonable behaviour that can cause physical or psychological harm. Employees can document the conduct, use internal complaint processes and challenge an inadequate or retaliatory employer response where the legal tests are met.
No Win No Fee employment advocacy means you usually do not pay professional fees upfront. Suitable employee cases are assessed on merit, evidence, likely recovery and whether the matter can be run commercially under the engagement terms.
People searching for an employment lawyer often need practical representation for a dismissal, Personal Grievance, mediation or Employment Relations Authority claim. In New Zealand, both lawyers and employment advocates can perform important representation roles, but they are not the same.
Casual employees have the same rights as permanent employees. The Employment Relations Act 2000 does not distinguish a casual employee from a permanent employee which can cause confusion.
Employer employment law help for Personal Grievance responses, disciplinary process, redundancy, MBIE mediation, ERA claims, settlement strategy and Employment Court risk.
An unjustified dismissal is a Personal Grievance claim. The central question is whether the employer's actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances.