ClickCease

Results for 90 day trial

Showing 153-160 of 295 results
KCY v XSH [2026] NZERA 516 - bullying complaint failures, forced transfer and dismissal over promotional gifts

Retail employee KCY complained of bullying linked to her Russian ethnicity, was placed on paid leave without proper consultation and directed to transfer stores immediately. She was later summarily dismissed over expired promotional gifts and disclosure of a back-office code.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Ashleigh Sanders v Hamilton City Council [2026] NZERA 517 - senior zoo manager's insidious conduct caused unjustified disadvantage

Hamilton Zoo's former senior manager subjected zookeeper Ashleigh Sanders to intrusive personal contact, out-of-hours messages, requests for information about colleagues, favouritism and career-related pressure. She later resigned, long after that manager had left.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Paul Adams v EverEdge Global Limited [2026] NZERA 509 - employer stopped paying founder to force resignation

EverEdge stopped paying founder and CEO Paul Adams while he continued working from Amsterdam, ignored repeated requests for his salary and later gave inconsistent explanations for the non-payment. Mr Adams ultimately resigned.

Matched passage: EverEdge supplied several later explanations: that Mr Adams had already resigned, that senior staff were not being paid, that Amsterdam was unauthorised, that he was not working, and that he was “contract staff” paid day-to-day.
Sione Afimeimounga v NPD Limited [2026] NZERA 506 - tanker driver constructively and unjustifiably dismissed

Tanker driver Sione Afimeimounga repeatedly raised workload, scheduling and health-and-safety concerns that NPD failed to resolve. After he resigned on extended notice, the employer suspended and summarily dismissed him over selected comments from a provocative text exchange with another driver.

Matched passage: It alleged a threat of violence and racial conduct, placed Mr Afimeimounga on paid special leave, held a disciplinary meeting three days later, and summarily dismissed him that same day.
Carol Chesmar v Rooney Earthmoving Limited [2026] NZERA 502 - redundancy consultation was more apparent than real

After more than nine years with Rooney Earthmoving, Carol Chesmar was selected for redundancy amid genuine work and financial pressure. The employer withheld information later relied on to justify the decision, did not consult about removing her from a major project and had effectively decided her role would go before consultation began.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Jia Jia v TBS Trading Limited and Helen Han [2026] NZERA 478 - no employment agreement, late wages and radio-silent dismissal

Jia Jia began work for TBS Trading without a written employment agreement, experienced late wage payments and then found the employer stopped communicating and providing work. The case concerned whether that silence and withdrawal of work amounted to dismissal as well as separate pay and documentation breaches.

Matched passage: She was interviewed on 2 July 2024 and began work for TBS the following day.
Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was made redundant by OH and N Contracting as forestry work wound down and no replacement work had been secured. The ERA accepted that business pressure was genuine but examined whether the employer consulted before deciding the redundancy and complied with notice and record obligations.

Matched passage: Unpaid wages and the notice-period error Mr Powell claimed payment for unpaid wages arising from OH & N's incorrect use of annual holiday pay instead of ordinary wages for his notice period.
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was made redundant from OH and N Contracting as forestry work reduced and no replacement contract had been secured. The ERA accepted there was a genuine business reason to reduce staff but examined whether the employer had consulted, disclosed information, considered alternatives and paid notice correctly.

Matched passage: He was the sole director of OH & N and, because of his day-to-day position in the business, had direct knowledge of Mr Powell's terms, conditions and pay arrangements.

Browse topics