ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 9-16 of 239 results
MURRAY v OWAKA MOTORS (2008) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 207 - driver-licence dismissal unjustified after inadequate investigation

Owaka Motors dismissed Mr Murray after he lost the driver licence required for his work. He also alleged mental-health discrimination and failure to provide an employment agreement, while the ERA examined whether the employer adequately investigated alternatives and heard from him before dismissal.

Matched passage: After that, The Authority held an investigation meeting in Dunedin on 27 August 2024.
LMN v STC [2026] NZEmpC 137 - unauthorised reference checks and medical leave caused unjustified disadvantage

The Employment Court found two unjustified disadvantages in a long-running school employment dispute: former employers listed on LMN's CV were contacted without authority while her grievances were being investigated, and medical certificates were not properly recognised when dealing with her leave. Most of LMN's wider claims failed.

Matched passage: Why this case matters The case gives practical content to the boundary between recruitment information and later workplace investigations.
Aaron Potter v Talley's Limited [2026] NZERA 412 - flawed HSR election disciplinary process and unjustified dismissal

Aaron Potter was disciplined and dismissed by Talley's after disputes surrounding a health and safety representative election and communications involving other employees. The case focused on whether Talley's properly investigated the competing accounts and relevant messages before deciding serious misconduct was established.

Matched passage: ... circumstances. To establish a fair process, Talley's needed to show that it had properly investigated the concerns, set them out clearly with relevant information, given Mr Potter a reasonable opportunity to respond, and considered his responses before deciding what happened ...
Clive Bryham v Electrix Limited (trading as Omexom New Zealand) [2026] NZERA 147 - interim reinstatement granted; arguable unjustified dismissal where employer alleged reputational harm without evidence

Clive Bryham, a long-serving field operations manager, was dismissed after Omexom alleged he mishandled an 'illegal connection' incident involving a direct report and exposed the business to reputational risk with a key client. He sought interim reinstatement pending final determination of his dismissal and disadvantage grievances.

Matched passage: It decided whether the employee should be temporarily put back into his role while the unjustified dismissal and disadvantage claims are investigated.
DRUMMOND v THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF MASSEY UNIVERSITY [2025] NZERA 82 - 90-day limit: warning grievance in time, earlier claims out

Jackson Drummond sought to pursue a series of disadvantage, discrimination and good-faith complaints against Massey University, some dating back many months before his December 2023 grievance letter. The preliminary issue was which claims had actually been raised within the statutory 90-day period.

Matched passage: ... DRUMMOND v THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF MASSEY UNIVERSITY Authority member: Kerry Anne Gloede Investigation meeting: 10 October 2024 (Auckland) Determination date: 17 February 2025 Outcome: Determination issued (procedural and/or costs issues); see decision for detail. Story in ...
Cameron Wong v Obers Brothers Construction Limited (in liquidation) [2025] NZERA 713 - dismissal, unpaid leave and $17,500 compensation

Painter Cameron Wong was told to pack his belongings and leave after a workplace confrontation, then received only part of his final entitlements. Obers Brothers Construction, already in liquidation, did not participate in the ERA investigation.

Matched passage: Obers Brothers Construction Limited did not participate in the Authority's investigation.
WEI v LIU and Anor [2025] NZERA 80 - dismissal and wage claims upheld; $15,000 compensation

Mr Wei's claims followed a workplace altercation and the employer's response to it, including the eventual end of his employment and disputed wage-related entitlements. CCTV footage and conflicting accounts of the incident were central to the ERA investigation.

Matched passage: In summary, Mr Wei claimed the respondents failed to address this matter in an appropriate manner, which he alleged led to him being subjected to a (quoted wording omitted) in the workplace by Ms Gong on 13 December 2023 (the altercation).
Nicholas Stalker v Elevate Builders Limited [2026] NZERA 659 - apprentice dismissed by text after repeated wage problems

Apprentice builder Nicholas Stalker experienced repeated late and missing wage payments before being dismissed by text for alleged performance and misconduct without prior warnings, investigation or an opportunity to respond. The ERA upheld unjustified dismissal and disadvantage claims and ordered compensation, 13 weeks' lost wages, substantial arrears, notice pay, holiday pay, a penalty and costs.

Matched passage: He said no such allegations had previously been raised and no warnings, investigation or disciplinary meeting had occurred.

Browse topics