ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 9-16 of 290 results
MOKE v RAUKURA HAUORA O TAINUI TRUST [2025] NZERA 48 - external investigation and disciplinary process partly unjustified

Ms Moke faced complaints and an external investigation while employed by Raukura Hauora O Tainui Trust. The case examined the fairness of the investigation, disciplinary steps and the Trust's eventual preliminary and final conclusions, including whether tikanga and kaupapa-based processes altered the statutory fairness requirements.

Matched passage: ... not to suspend Ms Moke while the concerns raised by the complaints of Mr A and Mr B were investigated and the initial private mediation held to discuss kanohi ki te kanohi how those complaints might be resolved. Reliance on incomplete investigation [109] There was a ...
Christmas party misconduct: when employers can discipline or dismiss

Employment-law lessons from misconduct at Christmas parties and other work functions, including alcohol, off-duty conduct, investigations and when discipline or dismissal may be justified.

Matched passage: Read our full article: Download File: Christmas Party Misconduct Read more Disciplinary meeting process @* TODO Workplace investigations *@ Unfair dismissal Employer advice The fastest way is to submit the case form with a short timeline and key documents.
Regina Rasheed v Commissioner of Zayed College for Girls [2026] NZERA 326 - school principal reinstated after unjustified dismissal

Long-serving school principal Regina Rasheed was suspended and dismissed after a series of complaints and governance interventions at Zayed College for Girls. The ERA examined the factual basis for the allegations, the fairness of the investigation and a second suspension imposed during the process.

Matched passage: The workplace investigation and dismissal The workplace investigation continued for many months.
Santamaria v Television New Zealand Ltd [2026] NZEmpC 210 - lawyer-led workplace review was not legally privileged

In an interlocutory Employment Court judgment, TVNZ failed to establish legal advice privilege over the Robins Report, a lawyer-led review of recruitment and workplace processes. The Court also rejected broad non-publication orders based only on general privacy and reputational concerns. The substantive dispute remains unresolved.

Matched passage: Why this case matters For workplace investigations and reviews, Santamaria is a valuable drafting and commissioning case.
VLN v Elizabeth Rose Dotcom, Kim Dotcom and Contractors Only Limited [2026] NZERA 508 - urgent removal to Employment Court

VLN brought claims about employment status and minimum employment standards arising from work at properties associated with Elizabeth and Kim Dotcom. With possible extradition affecting witness availability and enforcement, VLN sought urgent removal of the whole proceeding from the ERA to the Employment Court before the Authority investigation occurred.

Matched passage: What the Authority decided in this determination was that the entire proceeding should be removed urgently to the Employment Court before the Authority investigated it.
O'BRIEN v THE PLATFORM MEDIA NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 56 - disadvantage claims decided; later dismissal claims left separate

Ms O'Brien's proceeding against The Platform concerned employment grievances arising before her later dismissal. After the investigation meeting she sought to add dismissal-related claims, creating a procedural dispute about whether those new matters belonged in the determination already under way.

Matched passage: In summary, The question of whether the Authority's investigation should include the dismissal related claims, which were lodged after the investigation for this matter concluded, was the subject of disagreement.
MURRAY v OWAKA MOTORS (2008) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 207 - driver-licence dismissal unjustified after inadequate investigation

Owaka Motors dismissed Mr Murray after he lost the driver licence required for his work. He also alleged mental-health discrimination and failure to provide an employment agreement, while the ERA examined whether the employer adequately investigated alternatives and heard from him before dismissal.

Matched passage: After that, The Authority held an investigation meeting in Dunedin on 27 August 2024.

Browse topics