ClickCease

Results for disciplinary process

Showing 9-16 of 138 results
Deborah Coley v Bupa Care Services NZ Limited [2026] NZERA 530 - redundancy threat used to force variation of guaranteed hours

Deborah Coley's agreement guaranteed at least 32 hours each week, but Bupa sought to vary that guarantee by averaging hours across a six-week roster and presented redundancy as the alternative if she refused. A later disciplinary investigation and written warning added a second strand to the disadvantage claim.

Matched passage: A later disciplinary investigation and written warning also caused unjustified disadvantage.
Ilalio Solomona v Auckland Council [2026] NZERA 418 - conflict of interest dismissal unjustified

Ilalio Solomona was dismissed by Auckland Council after conflict-of-interest concerns about his outside personal-training business. Although his employment obligations could legitimately restrict outside activity, the disciplinary process did not put the contractual obligations actually relied on to him for response.

Matched passage: It found the Council had known about the relevant issues for a considerable period before launching a formal disciplinary process.
Disciplinary meetings: employee rights and common employer mistakes

Employee rights at a disciplinary meeting: clear allegations, relevant information, representation, time to prepare, a genuine opportunity to answer and an open-minded decision-maker.

Matched passage: Disciplinary meetings - how to protect yourself (and run a fair process) Disciplinary meetings are one of the most common places employers make mistakes.
Edmundo Marcelo v Golden Bulls Limited [2025] NZERA 814 - chef dismissed after failed food safety inspection; substantive grounds, but process flaws made dismissal unjustified; $13,707 ordered

Chef Edmundo Marcelo was dismissed by Golden Bulls after a failed food-safety inspection. The employer had substantive concerns about the incident, but the ERA examined whether those concerns were fairly put to him and whether the disciplinary decision was reached through a proper process.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal: whether the suspension and termination met the s 103A test (substance and process).
JAYALATH v INFOSYS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 539 - dismissal over mandatory training modules unjustified

Infosys dismissed Mr Jayalath for failing to complete mandatory online business modules after a disciplinary process run partly by overseas management. He challenged both the substantive basis for treating the failure as dismissible conduct and the fairness of the procedure.

Matched passage: The Authority notes that Mr Jayalath also claimed Infosys' process leading to his dismissal was flawed because he was not given ample opportunity to seek legal advice and properly respond to Infosys' allegations.
Disciplinary Meetings and Investigations
7 articles

Facing a disciplinary meeting or misconduct allegation? The employer should investigate properly, identify the allegations and evidence, give a genuine opportunity to respond, and keep an open mind before deciding on a warning or dismissal.

Continue
STEWART v OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED (3265479), OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED v STEWART (3275619) [2025] NZERA 330 - summary dismissal unjustified; 100% contribution removes lost wages

Open Country Dairy summarily dismissed Mr Stewart on the final day covered by his medical certificate after a disciplinary process. The ERA considered both the employer's process and Mr Stewart's own conduct when assessing justification and remedies.

Matched passage: ... $US100,000 from his consulting business. Decision markers Having regard to the reasonable process followed by Mr McCutcheon and Mr Peters and reviewing the transcript of the meeting, The Authority found Mr Stewart was capable of both understanding what was being put to him ...

Browse topics