ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 145-152 of 209 results
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: Remedies reflected the short period of employment The Authority awarded eight weeks' lost wages, calculated at $37 per hour for 41 hours per week, totalling $12,136 gross.
Fatima Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare Centre Inc [2026] NZERA 585 - performance dismissal lacked objective assessment

Minimarc Childcare dismissed ECE teacher Fatima Fahmy for performance after its centre manager remained the principal evaluator despite known relationship and bullying complaints. The ERA found the assessment was not sufficiently objective and ordered reinstatement, lost wages and $25,000 compensation.

Matched passage: ... Centre Incorporated, trading as Marc Early Learning Centre Role: registered ECE teacher Dismissal: 3 July 2025 Determination: 24 August 2026 Outcome: unjustified dismissal Reinstatement: ordered Lost wages: from dismissal to 30 April 2026, less casual earnings Compensation: ...
Lita Beattie v Matthew Roberts [2026] NZERA 450 - employee status, unpaid wages and constructive dismissal

Lita Beattie worked as Head Chef/Kitchen Manager in a relationship the respondent treated inconsistently and left with significant wage arrears. The ERA had to determine employee status, unpaid entitlements and whether employer conduct forced her resignation.

Matched passage: That made the resignation a constructive dismissal.
Tracy Alpar v Bookieland Limited [2026] NZERA 191 - unsigned seasonal fixed term not enforceable; dismissal by WhatsApp; $12,000 compensation and $14,000 reimbursement

Tracy Alpar worked for Bookieland under an unsigned seasonal fixed-term arrangement and was later told through WhatsApp that her employment had ended. The ERA had to decide whether the purported fixed term complied with the statutory requirements and whether the termination was justified.

Matched passage: Because Bookieland proceeded on an incorrect fixed term premise and did not follow a dismissal process (investigation, raising concerns, and giving a meaningful opportunity to respond), it could not justify the dismissal.
Nan Jia and Huachao Hou v FX NZ Limited and Yingsi Wei [2026] NZERA 30 - unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Construction workers Nan Jia and Huachao Hou alleged FX NZ made unlawful rent deductions from wages and failed to pay public-holiday, annual-leave and other minimum entitlements. Their case combined employment-standard claims with personal-grievance issues about the employer's treatment of them.

Matched passage: Mr Jia further claims unjustified dismissal as he says he was forced to resign when he was not provided with any hours of work.
TYACK v BIG B CARTAGE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 436 - text was not resignation; employer later dismissed employee

Big B Cartage said Mr Tyack had resigned by text, while Tyack maintained he had not and later attempted to return after a period of medical incapacity. The case turned on who actually ended the employment relationship and whether the employer could rely on the alleged resignation.

Matched passage: It was also evident that Mr Tyack had signalled that if Mr Sims proceeded to rely on the purported resignation, he would challenge this as an unjustified dismissal.
Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235 - Casual employment dismissal, penalties for no agreement

Neil Armstrong worked for Surplus Brokers in an arrangement the employer characterised as casual. The dispute concerned whether he had actually been dismissed, whether the casual label affected his rights, and the employer's failures to provide compliant employment documentation.

Matched passage: Mr Armstrong treated that as a dismissal and raised a personal grievance.
George Ngatai, Whanau Ora and the Broughton ERA decision [2023] NZERA 52

Mere Broughton was dismissed by The Whanau Ora Community Clinic after 106 days of employment under an agreement containing a probation provision. The case concerned whether the employer could treat probation as permitting dismissal without the ordinary justification and fair-process requirements.

Matched passage: The Authority found that the probation period expired on 14 June 2022 and had not been extended before its expiry.

Browse topics