ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 137-144 of 239 results
Adam Gifford v Uma Broadcasting Limited [2026] NZERA 96 - redundancy unjustified for consultation failures and no redeployment discussion; $24,230 lost wages, $19,000 compensation, $1,500 penalty

After 18 years at Radio Waatea, senior journalist and editor Adam Gifford was selected for redundancy in a restructure merging English and Māori newsroom functions. The employer had genuine business reasons but did not fairly disclose key proposal information, clearly identify his role as at risk or consult over redeployment.

Matched passage: ... Gifford v Uma Broadcasting Limited Registry: Auckland Authority member: Helen van Druten Investigation meeting: 27 and 28 November 2025 at Auckland Submissions received: 28 November 2025 from the Applicant; 28 November 2025 from the Respondent Determination date: 23 February ...
Robert Tunnicliffe v Solly's Freight (1978) Limited [2026] NZERA 91 - dismissed over limited-licence application; dismissal unjustified

Robert Tunnicliffe could not perform his ordinary driving duties and Solly's Freight placed him on alternative work while a limited-licence issue was being worked through. The relationship deteriorated over who should progress and pay for the licence application, and Solly's dismissed him on 24 April 2024.

Matched passage: The Authority's investigation For the Authority's investigation written witness statements were lodged from Mr Tunnicliffe and his wife Amanda Tunnicliffe.
LJB v EBD [2026] NZERA 78 - resigned employee sent home mid-notice with no process; dismissal unjustified; $16,500 compensation plus $9,000 penalties for withheld wages and missing time records

LJB had already resigned and was working out one month's notice when EBD's HR manager called her to a meeting, told her to clear her desk and sent her away before the notice period expired. No allegations or supporting material had been put to her in advance and she had no genuine opportunity to respond.

Matched passage: ... anonymised (three-letter identifiers used by the Authority) Authority member: Jeremy Lynch Investigation meeting: 11 November 2025 (Kerikeri) Determination date: 13 February 2026 Employment: marketing and events assistant (14 November 2022 to 10 April 2024) Key issues: (1) ...
Melissa Williams v S & M Haulage Limited (t/a Johnson Log Haulage) [2026] NZERA 74 - truck driver dismissed after one day; no valid 90-day trial clause; unjustified dismissal on process; remedies reduced for contribution

Melissa Williams was dismissed after a single day driving for S & M Haulage, which believed a 90-day trial applied and had genuine safety and resourcing concerns about her readiness for the role. The ERA examined whether there was a valid trial clause and whether she was given any chance to respond before termination.

Matched passage: ... S & M Haulage Limited (t/a Johnson Log Haulage) Authority member: Helen van Druten Investigation meeting: 11 and 14 November 2025 (Hamilton and by audio-visual link) Determination date: 13 February 2026 Key issues: (1) Was there a valid 90-day trial clause? (2) If not, ...
Jack Wills v Complex Forme Limited [2026] NZERA 76 - health centre worker dismissed by silence after no contract and no pay; $25,526.80 ordered plus penalties

Jack Wills worked at Complex Forme without a written agreement and was not paid for 32 hours of work. After he sought clarity about pay and rostering, the employer stopped responding, removed his access and ceased providing work.

Matched passage: ... [2026] NZERA 76 Parties: Jack Wills v Complex Forme Limited Authority member: Alyn Higgins Investigation meeting: 14 January 2026 in Napier Submissions received: From the Applicant at the investigation meeting and Determination date: 13 February 2026 Main issues: (1) whether ...
Wallace v Tang & Son Ltd [2026] NZERA 67 - husband-and-wife chefs dismissed after management conflict; both succeed; $95,448 ordered

Husband-and-wife chefs working at Buoy Café were dismissed after an escalating conflict with new management. The employer did not properly investigate the allegations or give either employee a genuine opportunity to respond before deciding to terminate them.

Matched passage: The Authority set a timetable for any costs memoranda and noted the notional daily rate for a one-day investigation meeting (stated as $4,500).
Kyle Spencer v Modern Transport Engineers Limited [2026] NZERA 60 - dismissal unjustified due to non-minor process defects; $12,000 compensation and employer damages offset

Modern Transport Engineers had evidence capable of supporting serious-misconduct concerns against Kyle Spencer, while also counterclaiming for unauthorised private work and purchases. However, it stood him down early, relied on undisclosed staff discussions and ran a process carrying signs of predetermination.

Matched passage: How the disciplinary process unfolded The investigation began in early January 2024.
Yifu Jiang v Smartrade Limited [2026] NZERA 56 - fixed-term clause held unlawful; unjustified dismissal; $15,600 lost wages and $12,000 compensation

Smartrade treated Yifu Jiang's employment as ending under a one-year fixed-term clause, but the agreement did not record genuine reasons satisfying s 66. Mr Jiang was also given no meaningful chance to comment before the employer ended the relationship.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 56 Parties: Yifu Jiang v Smartrade Limited Registry: Auckland Authority member: Marija Urlich Investigation meeting: 8 December 2025 Determination date: 2 February 2026 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal upheld.

Browse topics