ERA Home denied that Xuefeng Yang had ever become its employee, despite a signed employment agreement, an approved work visa and evidence that he worked at its construction site. The ERA found an employment relationship existed, upheld unjustified dismissal and disadvantage claims, awarded $23,000 compensation and $8,008.20 lost wages plus holiday pay, and imposed a $3,000 penalty on the company.
Matched passage: Underpayment and summary dismissal ERA Home did not provide the employment on the agreed terms, did not pay Mr Yang at the contractual hourly rate or in the agreed manner, and ended his employment without a disciplinary or dismissal process.