ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 129-136 of 169 results
Paul Adams v EverEdge Global Limited [2026] NZERA 509 - employer stopped paying founder to force resignation

EverEdge stopped paying founder and CEO Paul Adams while he continued working from Amsterdam, ignored repeated requests for his salary and later gave inconsistent explanations for the non-payment. Mr Adams ultimately resigned.

Matched passage: A deliberate attempt to coerce resignation The Authority also upheld the alternative constructive-dismissal basis: a deliberate course of conduct intended to force Mr Adams out.
Askkan Vakilipour Takaloo v Kaur Queens Trading Limited [2026] NZERA 507 - taxi driver was an employee and constructively dismissed

Kaur Queens Trading labelled taxi driver Ashkan Vakilipour Takaloo an independent contractor, but controlled and integrated his work into its taxi business. The relationship broke down amid withheld wages, aggressive verbal abuse and cancellation of his ability to work out his notice.

Matched passage: Although he gave notice, the director deactivated the access card he needed for the business, preventing him from working out the notice period.
Sione Afimeimounga v NPD Limited [2026] NZERA 506 - tanker driver constructively and unjustifiably dismissed

Tanker driver Sione Afimeimounga repeatedly raised workload, scheduling and health-and-safety concerns that NPD failed to resolve. After he resigned on extended notice, the employer suspended and summarily dismissed him over selected comments from a provocative text exchange with another driver.

Matched passage: A fair and reasonable employer could not treat that full exchange as serious misconduct justifying summary dismissal.
Carol Chesmar v Rooney Earthmoving Limited [2026] NZERA 502 - redundancy consultation was more apparent than real

After more than nine years with Rooney Earthmoving, Carol Chesmar was selected for redundancy amid genuine work and financial pressure. The employer withheld information later relied on to justify the decision, did not consult about removing her from a major project and had effectively decided her role would go before consultation began.

Matched passage: ... operator Length of service: more than nine years Issue: justification for redundancy dismissal Outcome: unjustified dismissal established Lost remuneration: $14,471.60 gross Compensation: $25,000 Contribution: no reduction Total ordered: $39,471.60 Costs: reserved ...
Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was made redundant by OH and N Contracting as forestry work wound down and no replacement work had been secured. The ERA accepted that business pressure was genuine but examined whether the employer consulted before deciding the redundancy and complied with notice and record obligations.

Matched passage: ... 5 May 2026 in Whanganui Determination date: 20 July 2026 Role: forestry worker Employment period: November 2022 to January 2025 Dismissal type: redundancy Business reason: genuine business information existed, but the process failed Dismissal: procedurally unjustified ...
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was made redundant from OH and N Contracting as forestry work reduced and no replacement contract had been secured. The ERA accepted there was a genuine business reason to reduce staff but examined whether the employer had consulted, disclosed information, considered alternatives and paid notice correctly.

Matched passage: ... in Whanganui Determination date: 20 July 2026 Role: site foreman in logging work Employment period: November 2022 to January 2025 Dismissal type: redundancy Business reason: genuine business information existed, but process failed Dismissal: procedurally unjustified ...
OAS v JIK Limited [2026] NZERA 474 - employee dismissed after seeking family violence leave

Chef OAS told JIK Limited he needed time away from work after family violence affecting his children, including meetings with victim support and steps toward a protection order. The employer treated his messages as resignation or abandonment and omitted him from the next roster.

Matched passage: JIK's decision not to put him on the next roster was a dismissal, and that dismissal was unjustified.
Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 - genuine redundancy but unjustified process

Neil Hall was made redundant from Consultex's Northland asbestos and mould work after a downturn that gave the employer a genuine reason to reduce headcount. The dispute centred on whether Consultex complied with its good-faith information and consultation obligations before choosing and implementing the redundancy.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 This Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination concerns the redundancy dismissal of Neil Hall, a Northland asbestos surveyor and certified mould-testing technician employed by Consultex Company Limited.

Browse topics