ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 129-136 of 209 results
Hao v South Pole IP Holding (NZ) Limited [2025] NZERA 245 - pressure to resign caused constructive dismissal

South Pole treated Xinhua Hao as having agreed to resign, despite his repeated denials, then withheld work and continued pressing the resignation dispute. The ERA found those actions caused an unjustified constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: Why this case matters Hao v South Pole is a practical example of a disputed resignation becoming constructive dismissal.
FHE v Auckland Transport [2026] NZERA 552 - justified dismissal but unjustified initial suspension

Auckland Transport investigated FHE over serious conduct involving a former employee with whom he had been in a relationship. Before completing a fair consultation process over suspension, AT had already effectively removed him from work for two days.

Matched passage: But those shortcomings did not ultimately cause unfair treatment in the dismissal decision.
Sheridan v Pact Group [2026] NZEmpC 51 - medical incapacity dismissal overturned

Roseanne Sheridan developed PTSD after a serious threat from a resident at work and was dismissed for medical incapacity about six months later. Specialist ACC information and rehabilitation planning were still developing, and a return-to-work process had not been completed.

Matched passage: UrlEncode(judgmentUrl); } Sheridan v Pact Group [2026] NZEmpC 51 - medical incapacity dismissal overturned Roseanne Sheridan's medical-incapacity dismissal had been upheld by the Employment Relations Authority.
FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 - constructive dismissal failed but unjustified disadvantage found over home visits

FEC was a beginning school principal whose relationship with the board deteriorated after a parent-related incident. Among the challenged conduct were after-hours visits by the presiding member to FEC's home to deal with school employment matters, followed eventually by FEC's resignation.

Matched passage: pdf"; } FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 This Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination concerns an anonymised school principal who resigned after a difficult period involving workload pressure, board issues, and an incident with a parent.
Employment Law Advice for Employers
20 articles

Employer employment law help for Personal Grievance responses, disciplinary process, redundancy, MBIE mediation, ERA claims, settlement strategy and Employment Court risk.

Continue
Federated farmers employment agreement disputes: common issues for NZ farmers

Common employment disputes for farming businesses using Federated Farmers or similar employment agreements, including hours, accommodation, deductions, leave, performance and execution of the agreement.

Matched passage: Where there is a trial period provision, having the employee perform work or relief milking before giving the employee the contract to sign.
Steven David Mitchell v Tasman Rugby Union Incorporated [2026] NZERA 435 - CEO returned to payroll on interim reinstatement

Tasman Rugby Union dismissed chief executive Steven Mitchell after an organisational review became intertwined with later misconduct allegations. He sought interim reinstatement, arguing the process appeared predetermined and that his substantive dismissal grievance had real strength.

Matched passage: ... May 2026, by AVL Determination date: 2 July 2026 Role: Chief Executive Officer Employment period: June 2024 to 20 March 2026 Application decided: interim reinstatement only Dismissal allegation: summary dismissal for serious misconduct Authority's interim assessment: an ...

Browse topics