ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 113-120 of 239 results
Lyon Kawhaaru v The Deck Tahuna Limited [2026] NZERA 288 - cafe worker told by email he was 'instant dismissed' after customer incident; unjustified dismissal upheld; remedies reduced 25% for contribution

Lyon Kawhaaru was 'instant dismissed' by email from The Deck Tahuna after a customer incident at the Nelson café. The ERA examined what actually occurred, whether the employer fairly investigated it and how Mr Kawhaaru's own conduct should affect remedies.

Matched passage: ... at the end of this page. At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 288 Registry: Wellington (investigation meeting held in Nelson) Authority member: Alyn Higgins Investigation meeting: 10 February 2026 (Nelson) Submissions received: 19 February and 1 March 2026 (Applicant); 24 ...
Gregory Brian Clarke v Omni Health Limited [2026] NZERA 265 - redundancy substantively justified, but process unfair; $10,000 compensation for disadvantage

Gregory Clarke was made redundant from Omni Health during financial and organisational change. The ERA accepted the commercial rationale and found no suitable redeployment role, but examined whether a series of consultation and process defects caused a separate unjustified disadvantage even though the redundancy itself was genuine.

Matched passage: ... At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 265 Registry: Auckland Authority member: Peter Fuiava Investigation meeting: 18 September 2025 (Auckland and AVL) Submissions / other information received: 10 and 24 October 2025 (Applicant); 17 October 2025, 30 January 2026, and 3 February ...
Phil Jacklin v Planit Software Testing Limited [2026] NZERA 264 - bonus clause held discretionary; KPI delay breached contract; $10,000 unjustified disadvantage award

Phil Jacklin argued that Planit Software Testing's short-term incentive clause guaranteed him a 25 percent bonus paid quarterly. The employer said the scheme was discretionary, while a separate issue concerned its failure to set KPIs and eligible amounts at the beginning of the financial year as promised.

Matched passage: ... a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 264 Registry: Wellington Authority member: Geoff O'Sullivan Investigation meeting: 18 and 19 November 2025 (Wellington) Submissions received: up to and including 15 April 2026 Determination date: 1 May 2026 Role: General Manager Central (managing ...
Adarsh Chand v Professional Stylish Barber Shop Limited [2026] NZERA 244 - unjustified constructive dismissal after unjustified warnings; $12,000 compensation + $14,560 reimbursement

Adarsh Chand resigned from Professional Stylish Barber Shop after disciplinary warnings and employment treatment he said had destroyed the relationship. The ERA examined whether the warning was substantively and procedurally justified and whether the resulting resignation was caused by the employer's breaches.

Matched passage: ... a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 244 Registry: Wellington Authority member: Geoff O'Sullivan Investigation meeting: 4 December 2025 (Wellington and AVL) Submissions / other information: up to and including 20 April 2026 Determination date: 23 April 2026 Core issues: minimum wage ...
FVG v YJN [2026] NZERA 242 - suspension and dismissal unjustified; remedies reduced 30% for contribution

FVG, a structural engineer, challenged her suspension, the handling of bullying and performance concerns, and her eventual dismissal by YJN. The case required the ERA to separate several disadvantage allegations from the fairness of the final dismissal process.

Matched passage: ... after discussion at a case management conference with the parties, the issues for investigation and determination are: (a) Was FVG disadvantaged by unjustifiable action of YJN regarding: (i) failure to investigate her bullying complaints against W; (ii) lowering of ...
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: The Authority's investigation For the Authority's investigation written witness statements were lodged from Ms Grinsted and Ms Obeid.
Courtney Jansen v BDS Chartered Accountants Limited [2026] NZERA 230 - 90 day trial phone termination + resignation option led to unjustified constructive dismissal; $7,000 compensation

Courtney Jansen was told by an external HR consultant that BDS Chartered Accountants would end her employment under a 90-day trial, but was offered the option of resigning instead. The case turned on whether choosing resignation in the face of an announced dismissal was truly voluntary.

Matched passage: ... At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 230 Registry: Auckland Authority member: Simon Greening Investigation meeting: 17 and 18 March 2026 (Auckland) Submissions received: 24 March 2026 (Applicant) and 27 March 2026 (Respondent) Determination date: 20 April 2026 Employment: ...
Stephanie Martin v SAS Builders Limited [2026] NZERA 226 - genuine restructure but consultation and redeployment failures

SAS Builders made Stephanie Martin redundant during a 2024 restructure. The central issues were whether the commercial restructure was genuine, whether the consultation was fair, and whether she should have been considered for a new role created in the business.

Matched passage: The Authority's investigation For the Authority's investigation written witness statements were lodged from Ms Martin and SAS's director Shaun Spillane.

Browse topics