ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 113-120 of 166 results
Blue Hunt v Lance Wakelin [2026] NZERA 463 - farm assistant unjustifiably dismissed after cowshed dispute

Farm assistant Blue Hunt's employment ended after a cowshed dispute with Lance Wakelin. The case required the ERA to determine who the employer was, whether Mr Hunt had been dismissed and whether any fair process or substantive reason justified the termination.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction The Authority was required to consider whether Mr Hunt contributed to the situation giving rise to the personal grievance.
Steven David Mitchell v Tasman Rugby Union Incorporated [2026] NZERA 435 - CEO returned to payroll on interim reinstatement

Tasman Rugby Union dismissed chief executive Steven Mitchell after an organisational review became intertwined with later misconduct allegations. He sought interim reinstatement, arguing the process appeared predetermined and that his substantive dismissal grievance had real strength.

Matched passage: Yet payroll reinstatement may still be just, particularly where the employee has a strongly arguable dismissal claim, the employer's process may have been predetermined, and the employee is likely to suffer greater financial harm while the merits case proceeds.
Filisi Beswick v Friendly Loans Limited [2026] NZERA 436 - medical incapacity dismissal without a fair inquiry

Friendly Loans dismissed Filisi Beswick for medical incapacity less than four weeks after hospitalisation, despite updated information that her condition had improved and requests to discuss returning or working from home. The employer also deducted $2,439.09 from her final pay for a loan.

Matched passage: ... 2024 Key issues: medical incapacity; reasonable recovery period; medical information; employee input; alternatives to dismissal; lawful wage deductions; lost remuneration; contribution Dismissal: unjustified Final-pay deduction: unlawful Compensation: $12,000 Lost wages: ...
Ronald Thomas Shea v STLand Contracting Limited (in liquidation) [2026] NZERA 420 - dismissed by phone without a process

Ronald Shea's hours at STLand Contracting fell sharply before he was told by phone that there was no more work for him. He also alleged bullying and an unsafe workplace, while the employer had undertaken no redundancy or dismissal consultation.

Matched passage: ... notice; work-time and logbook rules; bullying; psychological safety; lost wages; contribution; costs Dismissal: unjustified Unsafe workplace / bullying disadvantage: established Notice pay: $5,600 gross Lost wages: $16,000 gross Compensation: $23,000 Costs: $1,000 ...
Emma Baldwin v RJ Hospitality Solutions Limited [2026] NZERA 413 - unilateral roster changes after parental leave

Emma Baldwin returned to RJ Hospitality after parental leave to a dispute over rostered hours that had previously operated on a stable and regular basis. She challenged unilateral changes to that pattern and later claimed the breakdown of the relationship also amounted to dismissal.

Matched passage: An employee can succeed in a personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage even where the Authority does not find that the employment ended by dismissal.
Sophie Kennett v Polygon GY Developments Limited [2026] NZERA 405 - engineered resignation, redundancy and Holidays Act entitlements

Sophie Kennett resigned from Polygon GY Developments after a course of conduct she said was designed to force her out, in a context also involving a claimed redundancy and unpaid Holidays Act entitlements. The ERA examined the reality of the resignation rather than only its formal label.

Matched passage: 80 gross, plus 3% KiwiSaver contributions Statutory entitlements: $2,657.
Rachel Hankins v Huhtamaki Henderson Limited [2026] NZERA 379 - valid fixed term but unjustified early termination

Rachel Hankins was employed by Huhtamaki Henderson on a fixed-term arrangement. Although the ERA accepted there was a valid basis for the fixed term itself, her employment was ended before the agreed expiry and the employer had to justify that early termination separately.

Matched passage: The email also said that no handover was required, directed Ms Hankins to return all company property to the Otahuhu office by midday on 8 August, said final pay through 15 August would be processed by 15 August, and thanked her for her contributions.
Nata Venceslau Dos Santos v Nresh Group Limited [2026] NZERA 363 - hostile workplace, visa pressure, unjustified dismissal, wage arrears and penalties

Nata Venceslau Dos Santos described a hostile workplace in which visa-related pressure, pay issues and deteriorating treatment preceded the end of employment. The ERA considered dismissal alongside wage arrears and minimum employment-standard breaches.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction Nresh sought a reduction in remedies, arguing that Mr Dos Santos contributed to the situation giving rise to his grievances.

Browse topics