ClickCease

Results for dismissal process

Showing 105-112 of 270 results
Filisi Beswick v Friendly Loans Limited [2026] NZERA 436 - medical incapacity dismissal without a fair inquiry

Friendly Loans dismissed Filisi Beswick for medical incapacity less than four weeks after hospitalisation, despite updated information that her condition had improved and requests to discuss returning or working from home. The employer also deducted $2,439.09 from her final pay for a loan.

Matched passage: ... reasonable recovery period; medical information; employee input; alternatives to dismissal; lawful wage deductions; lost remuneration; contribution Dismissal: unjustified Final-pay deduction: unlawful Compensation: $12,000 Lost wages: $9,997 gross Unlawful deduction ...
Ilalio Solomona v Auckland Council [2026] NZERA 418 - conflict of interest dismissal unjustified

Ilalio Solomona was dismissed by Auckland Council after conflict-of-interest concerns about his outside personal-training business. Although his employment obligations could legitimately restrict outside activity, the disciplinary process did not put the contractual obligations actually relied on to him for response.

Matched passage: ... date: 26 June 2026 Role: Fitness Instructor, Birkenhead Pool and Leisure Centre Dismissal: Summary dismissal for alleged serious misconduct on 7 February 2025 Key issues: outside personal-training business; conflict declarations; social-media videos made at the ...
Auto John Huntley-Byrne v Dallison 2021 Limited [2026] NZERA 354 - unjustified café dismissal by text message

Dallison 2021 dismissed café worker Auto John Huntley-Byrne by text after end-of-shift tasks were left incomplete. Although the employer had legitimate concerns, it did not hold a proper disciplinary meeting or provide the support-person and response rights required by its own documents.

Matched passage: The Authority was particularly clear that the group Messenger exchange was not a suitable substitute for a disciplinary process where dismissal was possible.
Jennifer Jacobsen v Cube Innovations Limited [2026] NZERA 356 - invalid trial period, no notice, and dismissal by email

Jennifer Jacobsen was dismissed by email only days into part-time work for Cube Innovations. Cube relied on a 90-day trial even though the evidence indicated she had started work before signing the agreement and the employer had not given the contractual notice required by the clause.

Matched passage: ... rate: $29 per hour Expected hours: Monday, 8:30am to 3:00pm with a half-hour lunch break Dismissal date: 4 March 2025 Trial period: held invalid / unavailable to protect the dismissal Unjustified dismissal: established Unjustified disadvantage: established for failure to ...
Philip Moller v Cardinal Logistics Limited [2026] NZERA 318 - drug test refusal, unjustified dismissal, unjustified suspension

Philip Moller was dismissed by Cardinal Logistics after refusing a drug and alcohol test said to arise from a safety complaint. The case turned on whether Cardinal had genuine and reasonable grounds to require the test and whether it fairly verified the allegation before suspending and dismissing him.

Matched passage: ... date: 22 May 2026 Employment: professional Class 5 Driver Key issues: unjustified dismissal; unjustified suspension; drug and alcohol testing; reasonable cause testing; refusal to test; serious misconduct; verification of complaint; procedural fairness; contribution ...
John Pio v Strautmann Hopkins [2026] NZERA 164 - genuine redundancy but rushed consultation made dismissal unjustified

Regional sales manager John Pio was made redundant after Strautmann Hopkins lost the distribution licence underpinning its business. The redundancy had a genuine commercial basis, but Pio was given little warning, very limited time to seek advice and no meaningful opportunity to explore transfer or redeployment.

Matched passage: SHL was responsible for and wholly in control of the process which has resulted in Mr Pio's dismissal.
Clive Bryham v Electrix Limited (trading as Omexom New Zealand) [2026] NZERA 147 - interim reinstatement granted; arguable unjustified dismissal where employer alleged reputational harm without evidence

Clive Bryham, a long-serving field operations manager, was dismissed after Omexom alleged he mishandled an 'illegal connection' incident involving a direct report and exposed the business to reputational risk with a key client. He sought interim reinstatement pending final determination of his dismissal and disadvantage grievances.

Matched passage: Serious question to be tried The ERA did not decide whether the dismissal was ultimately justified.
Rimple Rimple v NZ - Kebabs Limited, Rupinder Kaur Bal, Gursahib Singh Dhillon, and Harpal Bal [2026] NZERA 128 - premium sought for AEWV role; abandonment dismissal unjustified after visa cancellation; $22,620 lost wages, $14,000 compensation, $16,000 penalty plus entitlements

A Rotorua kebab restaurant recruited Rimple Rimple from India on an AEWV, with evidence that a director sought a $34,000 payment to secure the job. After visa difficulties the employer treated him as having abandoned employment and stopped providing work.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal: abandonment vs fair process NZKL's position was that Ms Rimple was due back from leave on 16 February 2025 and had abandoned employment by not returning.

Browse topics