ClickCease

Results for holiday pay

Showing 89-96 of 102 results
Cameron Rix v Rotorua Quarry Limited [2025] NZERA 152 - The Authority found the employee was unjustifiably dismissed (abandonment was not made out) and awarded remedies.

Rotorua Quarry treated Cameron Rix's absence as abandonment and ended his employment. The ERA had to decide whether his conduct showed an intention to permanently walk away from the job and whether the employer was entitled to terminate on that basis.

Matched passage: I need to consider however the submission by RQL that the fact Mr Rix later went onto ACC which was backdated, should be taken into account in assessing lost wages.
THING v SOUTH POLE IP HOLDING (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 142 - dismissal theory fails in part but disadvantage grievance succeeds

Ms Thing's dispute with South Pole IP Holding concerned whether the end of her employment was a dismissal or resignation and whether the employer's earlier conduct had unjustifiably disadvantaged her. The case required the ERA to distinguish direct or constructive dismissal from separate disadvantage grievances.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $15, 000 Lost wages: $8,000 8 weeks' lost wages Holiday pay: $23.
RAY YU v SYNERGY NUTRITION LIMITED [2025] NZERA 64 - Unjustified dismissal and unjustified disadvantage (warning)

Synergy Nutrition issued Ray Yu a written warning and later dismissed him amid concerns including phone use and his ability to work night shifts. The ERA separately assessed the fairness of the warning, dismissal and Yu's own conduct under the contribution provisions.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Reimbursement of lost wages: $5,932.
Mere Broughton v The Whanau Ora Community Clinic Ltd [2023] NZERA 52 - Unjustified dismissal, probation clause misused

Mere Broughton was dismissed after 106 days at The Whanau Ora Community Clinic. Her agreement contained a probation clause, and the dispute centred on the employer's attempt to use that clause as a shortcut to termination rather than carrying out a substantively justified and fair process.

Matched passage: No notice paid: Ms Broughton was dismissed without notice or payment in lieu of notice.
Bridget Addy v Auckland Steam 'N' Dry Limited and Graeme Stephens [2022] NZERA 657 - constructive dismissal after a 'trial period' threat by text; $8,000 compensation, $3,600 reimbursement, $2,000 penalty

Auckland Steam 'N' Dry raised performance concerns with Bridget Addy by text and threatened that she would not make it through a supposed three-month trial, although her agreement contained no trial clause. She resigned in response.

Matched passage: Wages and payment issues The determination also deals with late final pay, holiday pay, and deductions.
Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235 - Casual employment dismissal, penalties for no agreement

Neil Armstrong worked for Surplus Brokers in an arrangement the employer characterised as casual. The dispute concerned whether he had actually been dismissed, whether the casual label affected his rights, and the employer's failures to provide compliant employment documentation.

Matched passage: Lost wages declined: while lost wages were claimed, the evidence did not support an award for lost wages (including issues around mitigation and health).
Siddanth Prasad & Ors v Fiji Food Distributors NZ Limited [2025] NZERA 659 - wage arrears, unjustified dismissal and $32,000 compensation each

Four Krazy Price Mart employees said they routinely worked about 60 hours over six days while being paid for substantially fewer hours and were later dismissed when the business was sold without adequate consultation. The case combined personal grievances with extensive minimum-entitlement claims.

Matched passage: Unlawful employment premium Amit Verma also established that he had paid $8,000 for his employment.
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: PAYE payroll and the real nature of the relationship From around September 2024, at the suggestion of an NZSL director, Mr Graves was placed on NZSL's PAYE payroll and received fortnightly payslips.

Browse topics