ClickCease

Results for constructive dismissal

Showing 89-94 of 94 results
No Win No Fee
6 articles

No Win No Fee employment advocacy means you usually do not pay professional fees upfront. Suitable employee cases are assessed on merit, evidence, likely recovery and whether the matter can be run commercially under the engagement terms.

Continue
Casual Employment
9 articles

Casual employees have the same rights as permanent employees. The Employment Relations Act 2000 does not distinguish a casual employee from a permanent employee which can cause confusion.

Continue
Thomas Patrick Kenna v Anztec Limited [2026] NZERA 120 - redundancy found genuine but consultation defective; unjustified disadvantage; $15,000 compensation

Thomas Kenna was made redundant from Anztec after a restructuring that the ERA accepted had a genuine business basis. He challenged alleged predetermination and the employer's failure to proactively disclose information needed to understand and respond to the proposal.

Matched passage: Outcome: Redundancy was genuine and dismissal substantively justified, but significant good faith/consultation defects meant unjustified disadvantage was upheld.
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: Ms Obeid told the Authority that her intention at the meeting was to provide Ms Grinsted with constructive feedback regarding her conduct and her alignment.
WXN v Auckland International Airport Ltd [2021] NZEmpC 205 - interim reinstatement granted on challenge

WXN, a long-serving Auckland Airport maintenance technician, lost his job after not meeting a COVID-19 vaccination requirement and sought interim reinstatement while challenging the termination. The ERA declined interim relief.

Matched passage: Among the matters requiring proper examination was whether the employer had adequately and constructively considered alternatives which could preserve the employment relationship.
Amanda Bradley v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2026] NZERA 441 - FireSuper eligibility and poor communication

Amanda Bradley challenged FENZ's handling of her eligibility for FireSuper and the way information about that benefit was communicated after she took a newly created regional training-management role. The case focused on whether misleading or inadequate communication caused an employment disadvantage.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Amanda Bradley v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2026] NZERA 441 This Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination concerns a Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ) Manager Region Training who sought access to the FireSuper workplace superannuation scheme.

Browse topics