ClickCease

Results for warnings

Showing 73-80 of 104 results
Jonathan Rhodes v Barfoot & Thompson Limited [2026] NZERA 543 - medical incapacity dismissal before a genuine opportunity to recover

Barfoot & Thompson dismissed senior property manager Jonathan Rhodes for medical incapacity while he was recovering from concussion and further head injuries. An imminent neurological assessment had not been obtained and the proposed alternative role did not fit clinical advice for a graduated return on reduced hours.

Matched passage: It maintained contact, sought information from the Stay at Work service, provided advance warning that dismissal was possible, met with Mr Rhodes and his support person, and used colleagues and relief staff to manage work where possible.
Briar Kennedy v Adulto HR Limited [2026] NZERA 537 - missing trial clause and predetermined performance dismissal

Adulto HR believed Briar Kennedy was on a 90-day trial, but the agreement given after she started contained no trial clause. The employer then purported to extend the nonexistent trial into probation and dismissed her after 97 days on qualification and performance grounds.

Matched passage: ... does not justify dismissal without clear standards, support, measurable expectations, warning of the consequences, disclosure of the information relied on, and genuine consideration of the employee's response. If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the ...
Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was made redundant by OH and N Contracting as forestry work wound down and no replacement work had been secured. The ERA accepted that business pressure was genuine but examined whether the employer consulted before deciding the redundancy and complied with notice and record obligations.

Matched passage: The dismissal was abrupt, confusing, and occurred without warning or discussion.
FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 - constructive dismissal failed but unjustified disadvantage found over home visits

FEC was a beginning school principal whose relationship with the board deteriorated after a parent-related incident. Among the challenged conduct were after-hours visits by the presiding member to FEC's home to deal with school employment matters, followed eventually by FEC's resignation.

Matched passage: The case is also a warning about boundaries.
Ilalio Solomona v Auckland Council [2026] NZERA 418 - conflict of interest dismissal unjustified

Ilalio Solomona was dismissed by Auckland Council after conflict-of-interest concerns about his outside personal-training business. Although his employment obligations could legitimately restrict outside activity, the disciplinary process did not put the contractual obligations actually relied on to him for response.

Matched passage: Why this case matters Solomona v Auckland Council is a practical warning about characterising a disciplinary allegation accurately.
Jennifer Jacobsen v Cube Innovations Limited [2026] NZERA 356 - invalid trial period, no notice, and dismissal by email

Jennifer Jacobsen was dismissed by email only days into part-time work for Cube Innovations. Cube relied on a 90-day trial even though the evidence indicated she had started work before signing the agreement and the employer had not given the contractual notice required by the clause.

Matched passage: Trial period warning: this is another reminder that trial periods are technical.
Shaoqiang Chen v Wen Hui Lin [2026] NZERA 307 - cash-paid cook unjustifiably dismissed, minimum wage arrears and penalties ordered

Shaoqiang Chen worked long hours as a cook at Beached As Takeaways, was paid cash below lawful rates and later had his employment ended. The case involved employer identity, minimum-wage and holiday entitlements, record failures and the justification for dismissal.

Matched passage: There was no warning that his job was at risk.
Anna Murgatroyd v Xero (NZ) Limited [2026] NZERA 305 - redundancy procedurally unfair but no sham; compensation and lost wages ordered

Anna Murgatroyd was selected for redundancy from Xero's education team after a restructure. She alleged the process was predetermined, relying on an earlier Miro board, and also challenged the use of performance-related comments by a selection panel that included her manager.

Browse topics