The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. On the morning of the investigation meeting scheduled for 21 December 2023, it became apparent that Mr Uerata would be unable to attend the meeting.
Employment Law
We represent employers and employees in employment disputes in New Zealand. All employees have rights under the Employment Relations Act 2000. This blog discusses common and relevant issues in New Zealand employment law.
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Browse topics
Browse articles
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. However, Mr Sharma has since resiled from that position and says that no monies are owed and that Mr Nair was not dismissed but resigned after a heated argument with his employer.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Changes to Mr Dai's evidence Mr Dai's evidence during the investigation meeting materially differed from what he had recorded in his written witness statement dated 11 September 2024.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Ms Johnstone says ZXY unjustifiably dismissed her for failing to call an ambulance after an incident involving a resident she cared for (among other things).
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. The Authority's investigation [4] An investigation meeting was held on 7 and 8 August 2024.
A penalty determination was made. ADO was given notice of termination on the grounds of redundancy, with his employment to cease on 15 January 2024.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Mr Knox was asked to provide feedback by 1pm on 29 September 2023 and was provided the proposal document after the meeting at approximately 11:45AM.
ERA held the employer acted unjustifiably by changing rostering without giving the employee a reasonable chance to comment, and by running a deficient process before issuing a final written warning. Compensation of $8,500 was ordered and costs were reserved.
