In Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235, the ERA found a casual employee was unjustifiably dismissed during a period of engagement. The Authority awarded $9,000 compensation (after 10% reduction for contributory conduct) and imposed a $1,000 penalty for failing to provide an intended employment agreement.
Employment Law
We represent employers and employees in employment disputes in New Zealand. All employees have rights under the Employment Relations Act 2000. This blog discusses common and relevant issues in New Zealand employment law.
Search
Find employment law articles and guides quickly.
Tip: press / to search
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Popular searches
Browse topics
Unfair Dismissal Cases (160)
Unjustified Disadvantage (62)
Redundancy (34)
Constructive Dismissal (26)
90 Day Trial (23)
Unfair Dismissal (20)
Employment Law News Opinion (19)
Employment Law Advice For Employers (12)
Employment Lawyers (9)
Costs (7)
Employment Court (7)
Employment Mediation (6)
No Win No Fee (6)
Casual Employment (3)
Covid 19 (3)
ERA (3)
Special Interest Cases (2)
Holidays Act (1)
Browse topics
Browse articles
Showing 241-241 of 241 articles
Unfair Dismissal Cases
160
Unjustified Disadvantage
62
Redundancy
34
Constructive Dismissal
26
90 Day Trial
23
Unfair Dismissal
20
Employment Law News Opinion
19
Employment Law Advice For Employers
12
Employment Lawyers
9
Costs
7
Employment Court
7
Employment Mediation
6
No Win No Fee
6
Casual Employment
3
Covid 19
3
ERA
3
Special Interest Cases
2
Holidays Act
1
