In Leo Waters v S.T.L Linehaul Ltd [2021] NZERA 304, the ERA held the redundancy dismissal was unjustified due to a lack of consultation, lack of relevant information, and failure to properly explore alternatives and redeployment. The Authority awarded $17,000 compensation and reserved costs.
Employment Law
We represent employers and employees in employment disputes in New Zealand. All employees have rights under the Employment Relations Act 2000. This blog discusses common and relevant issues in New Zealand employment law.
Search
Find employment law articles and guides quickly.
Tip: press / to search
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Popular searches
Browse topics
Unfair Dismissal Cases (128)
Unjustified Disadvantage (44)
Redundancy (25)
Constructive Dismissal (24)
90 Day Trial (20)
Unfair Dismissal (19)
Employment Law Advice For Employers (11)
Employment Law News Opinion (9)
Employment Lawyers (8)
Costs (6)
No Win No Fee (6)
Employment Mediation (5)
Casual Employment (3)
Covid 19 (3)
Employment Court (3)
ERA (2)
Holidays Act (1)
Browse topics
Browse articles
Showing 193-194 of 194 articles
In Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235, the ERA found a casual employee was unjustifiably dismissed during a period of engagement. The Authority awarded $9,000 compensation (after 10% reduction for contributory conduct) and imposed a $1,000 penalty for failing to provide an intended employment agreement.
Unfair Dismissal Cases
128
Unjustified Disadvantage
44
Redundancy
25
Constructive Dismissal
24
90 Day Trial
20
Unfair Dismissal
19
Employment Law Advice For Employers
11
Employment Law News Opinion
9
Employment Lawyers
8
Costs
6
No Win No Fee
6
Employment Mediation
5
Casual Employment
3
Covid 19
3
Employment Court
3
ERA
2
Holidays Act
1
