![RAINA v HALL'S REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 469 - The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.](/Images/site/EmploymentAdvocatesAucklandCard.jpg)
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
New Zealand unfair dismissal (unjustified dismissal) case summaries from the Employment Relations Authority (ERA), explaining key facts, outcomes, and lessons for employees and employers.
These unfair dismissal (unjustified dismissal) case summaries cover Employment Relations Authority (ERA) decisions from across New Zealand. Each case highlights the facts, the Authority's reasoning, and the outcome, so you can see what tends to help or hurt a dismissal justification.
If you are dealing with a dismissal dispute, these examples can help you understand common errors in process, the standard of reasonableness applied, and typical remedies where a dismissal is found to be unjustified.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Mr Tong's grievance claims Claims for unjustified disadvantage and unjustified dismissal [20] Mr Tong's closing submissions did not differentiate which alleged facts supported each of his grievance claims.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Mr Wang says that he was dismissed and has made grievance claims for unjustified dismissal and disadvantages during his employment including bullying and harassment, unilateral shift changes and...
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. However, if he was taken to have resigned, Mr Zheng said this was caused by breaches of his terms of employment so was really a constructive dismissal, resulting from actions initiated by JCD.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. In April 2024 Ms Ku's employment was terminated for redundancy.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Determination: 28 July 2025 DETERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY Employment Relationship Problem [1] The Applicant, Mr Gillard claims he was unjustifiably dismissed by his former employer (SSM).
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. The letter referred to matters set out by WRW in her resignation letter and several additional matters.
Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded). This determination comes from the Christchurch registry. The parties are LEBRETON (employee) and DA HAI INVESTMENT LIMITED (employer).