If you can show the employer labelled something as "serious misconduct" when it was not rational to do so, you often get leverage: leverage on justification, leverage on process, and now (post-2026) leverage on remedies.
Search employment law articles and guides
Use the search box below (or in the menu bar above) to find topics and articles.
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Results for ERA
If those reviews are incentivized, fake, or otherwise not genuine, the overall impression created can be misleading.
Public court list information confirms an Employment Court judicial review hearing in Menzies v Employment Relations Authority and Another on 10 February 2026.
Names and events are discussed because they have already been published in a public judgment and in RNZ coverage.
In practice, sock-puppet reviews often have the same tells: No real details (no date, no service, no identifiable interaction).
(Peter Drennan) Important: This article is general information for employers.
Section 66(1)(c) - "common name" (the claim being that the mark has become a common name in general public use).
Important: This page is commentary and general information.
