In this interim decision, the ERA did not finally determine the allegations.
Search employment law articles and guides
Use the search box below (or in the menu bar above) to find topics and articles.
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Results for ERA
The ERA held the company could not reasonably conclude she was incapable of her ongoing duties, had not sought her input, had not allowed sufficient recovery time, and had not considered alternatives.
The ERA found that eligibility was conditional upon the FireSuper Trust Deed or the Trustees' discretion, and it could not direct FENZ to confer rank or classify the MRT role as Black Watch.
The ERA found a clear dismissal without consultation, found that Mr Shea had also been bullied in an unsafe workplace, and ordered $45,600 in notice pay, lost wages, compensation and costs.
Ilalio Solomona v Auckland Council [2026] NZERA 418 - conflict of interest dismissal unjustified
Case... and three social-media videos filmed at a Council leisure centre. The ERA held that the Council relied on policies which did not in substance fit the alleged conflict, failed to raise the contractual obligations it ...
The ERA rejected the dismissal and bullying claims, but found an unjustified disadvantage.
... connected with an election for a health and safety representative. The ERA found Talley's had not properly investigated the complaint, had not clearly set out the allegations or supporting information, had not given ...
Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 - genuine redundancy but unjustified process
CaseThe ERA found unjustified dismissal and ordered $8,000 compensation, with no reduction for contribution.
