ERA held the employee was constructively and unjustifiably dismissed when the employer told her not to return to work until mid-January and refused to pay her contracted hours.
Search employment law articles and guides
Use the search box below (or in the menu bar above) to find topics and articles.
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Results for ERA
The Authority ordered arrears, lost remuneration, $18,000 compensation each (after contribution), and a $10,000 penalty.
A practical summary of Payal v JB Hospitality Ltd [2026] NZERA 18.
In George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14, the ERA held the 90-day trial was invalid because the employee had already worked (and been paid) before signing.
Summary of Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8.
JHJ v IXX [2026] NZERA 2 is an unjustified dismissal determination.
In Jingkai Wang v E|nvoco Ltd [2025] NZERA 845, the ERA found the employee was not dismissed and had resigned.
ERA accepted serious food safety and hygiene deficiencies justified dismissal in substance, but found the suspension and termination process was flawed and unfair.
