Constructive dismissal: when resignation becomes an unfair dismissal personal grievance
Constructive dismissal (resignation) personal grievance law. If your employer is pushing you to resign, get advice first. In many cases, do not resign.
A constructive dismissal is a resignation where an employee finds no choice but to resign. If a constructive dismissal occurs, the employee can later bring a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
A constructive dismissal is a resignation where the employee says they had no real choice but to resign because of the employer's actions. If it is truly a constructive dismissal, it can be treated as an unjustified dismissal personal grievance.
The classic NZ categories come from Woolworths. Constructive dismissal can occur where:
Where an employee resigns and claims constructive dismissal, the onus is on the employee to show that a dismissal has occurred in substance. That is why the "do not resign" advice is so important.
A common scenario is a disciplinary meeting or investigation where the employer is heading toward termination, then suggests the employee resign instead. Employees often think resignation "looks better", but legally it can destroy an unjustified dismissal claim because the end of employment can be treated as the employee's decision.
In many cases, the better approach is:
Constructive dismissal arguments often come up where there is a pattern of behaviour or a serious event that makes continued employment intolerable. Examples can include:
Personal grievances generally must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action or when it came to the employee's notice (whichever is later). With constructive dismissal, the timeline can become complicated (because it can involve a series of events), so delay can be fatal.
Constructive dismissal claims are evidence heavy. If you are considering resignation (or you have resigned), gather and preserve:
If you resign and later claim constructive dismissal, the resignation letter can become key evidence. If you intend to claim constructive dismissal, your letter should clearly record the reasons and complaints and the fact you previously raised concerns.
Your resignation letter (constructive dismissal style) should usually:
If a constructive dismissal is established, it is treated as a form of unjustified dismissal. Potential remedies can include reinstatement (where reasonable), reimbursement of lost wages, and compensation for hurt and humiliation. Outcomes depend on the facts and what happened after the resignation (including mitigation and job search).
Constructive dismissal risk is often created by poor process, unmanaged conflict, and sloppy communications. If you are managing a high conflict situation, get advice early and document your steps.
Employer advice and dispute defence
The fastest way is to submit the case form with a short timeline and key documents.
We will assess whether a constructive dismissal argument is realistic and what your best next step is.
Employee Case Form
Constructive dismissal (resignation) personal grievance law. If your employer is pushing you to resign, get advice first. In many cases, do not resign.
Resignation letter templates for (1) an amicable resignation and (2) a constructive dismissal resignation. If you might later raise a Personal Grievance, the wording and timing matters.
A detailed summary of [2026] NZERA 16. The Authority ordered repayment of an unlawful premium and substantial wage arrears. The employee's resignation was treated as a constructive dismissal.
In OCO v ZUA [2025] NZERA 790 (Christchurch), the ERA found a truck driver who resigned in November 2022 was constructively dismissed. The Authority found the employer's suspension decision was unfair and lacked proper grounds, the complaint investigation outcome was misleading, and the employer commenced a serious misconduct process without identifying complainants or detailing allegations. Those breaches were serious and it was reasonably foreseeable resignation might result. The ERA ordered $11,868.84 gross reimbursement and $30,000 compensation (total $41,868.84) payable within 28 days. A non-publication order protects the identities of both parties and the applicant's family.
In GXQ v NMK [2025] NZERA 772 (Auckland), the ERA found the applicant was unjustifiably constructively dismissed after the employer failed to maintain a safe workplace free from discrimination and psychological harm, including serious flaws in a workplace investigation and an unreasonable disciplinary approach. The ERA made a permanent non-publication order and awarded $25,274.31 special damages (legal fees), $80,903 gross reimbursement for lost wages, $55,618.47 gross for a short term incentive payment, and $40,000 gross compensation, payable within 21 days.
In Benjamin Thomas v Matthew Scott and Patricia Scott trading as Infinity Dairy [2025] NZERA 592 (Christchurch, investigation meeting in Timaru), the ERA found the employee was unjustifiably disadvantaged by an indefinite paid suspension imposed without proper basis or process, and then unjustifiably constructively dismissed after months of silence and failure to investigate. Remedies included $3,545.75 lost wages, $30,000 compensation (split $5,000 disadvantage and $25,000 constructive dismissal), and costs of $4,571.55, payable within 21 days.
Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded). This determination comes from the Auckland registry. The parties are QNZ (employee) and RNV (employer).
Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded). This determination comes from the Auckland registry. The parties are ABBAS (employee) and NO1 BLINDS LIMITED (employer).