The Authority found a constructive dismissal was established. In this case Mr Paetz was not dismissed by Solly's, he resigned.
A constructive dismissal is a resignation where an employee finds no choice but to resign. If a constructive dismissal occurs, the employee can later bring a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
A constructive dismissal is a resignation where the employee says they had no real choice but to resign because of the employer's actions. If it is truly a constructive dismissal, it can be treated as an unjustified dismissal personal grievance.
The classic NZ categories come from Woolworths. Constructive dismissal can occur where:
Where an employee resigns and claims constructive dismissal, the onus is on the employee to show that a dismissal has occurred in substance. That is why the "do not resign" advice is so important.
A common scenario is a disciplinary meeting or investigation where the employer is heading toward termination, then suggests the employee resign instead. Employees often think resignation "looks better", but legally it can destroy an unjustified dismissal claim because the end of employment can be treated as the employee's decision.
In many cases, the better approach is:
Constructive dismissal arguments often come up where there is a pattern of behaviour or a serious event that makes continued employment intolerable. Examples can include:
Personal grievances generally must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action or when it came to the employee's notice (whichever is later). With constructive dismissal, the timeline can become complicated (because it can involve a series of events), so delay can be fatal.
Constructive dismissal claims are evidence heavy. If you are considering resignation (or you have resigned), gather and preserve:
If you resign and later claim constructive dismissal, the resignation letter can become key evidence. If you intend to claim constructive dismissal, your letter should clearly record the reasons and complaints and the fact you previously raised concerns.
Your resignation letter (constructive dismissal style) should usually:
If a constructive dismissal is established, it is treated as a form of unjustified dismissal. Potential remedies can include reinstatement (where reasonable), reimbursement of lost wages, and compensation for hurt and humiliation. Outcomes depend on the facts and what happened after the resignation (including mitigation and job search).
Constructive dismissal risk is often created by poor process, unmanaged conflict, and sloppy communications. If you are managing a high conflict situation, get advice early and document your steps.
Employer advice and dispute defence
The fastest way is to submit the case form with a short timeline and key documents.
We will assess whether a constructive dismissal argument is realistic and what your best next step is.
Employee Case Form
The Authority found a constructive dismissal was established. In this case Mr Paetz was not dismissed by Solly's, he resigned.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Determination: 5 May 2025 DETERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY Employment relationship problem [1] Xinhua (Henry) Hao resigned from his employment with South Pole IP Holding (NZ) Limited (South Pole) on 26...
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). She further says Winton failed to address the distress and harm she experienced as a result of that behaviour; told her the behaviour would likely continue; told her that the...
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). Ms Thing (quoted wording omitted) and returns to work [18] On 30 April 2022, Ms Thing informed Ms Liu via WeChat message that she was resigning as she did not think the job was...
A penalty determination was made. He says he had no choice but to resign due to an unfair and unjustified investigation the employer undertook into alleged conduct of his and that his resignation was in law an unjustifiable constructive dismissal.
Mr Resink says that he was unjustifiably constructively dismissed because either ES breached a duty to him that was serious enough that ES ought to have foreseen he would resign; or alternatively there was a course of conduct...
ERA found the employee was constructively and unjustifiably dismissed after the employer raised performance concerns by text and threatened she would not make it out of a '3-month trial' when no trial clause existed. Orders included $3,600 reimbursement, $8,000 compensation, and a $2,000 penalty, and the employer's $10,000 counter-claim was dismissed.