90-day trial dismissal: when you can still raise an unfair dismissal personal grievance
NZ 90-day trial period law explained. If the trial clause or notice is defective, you may still raise a Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified dismissal. Check common mistakes.
90 day trial dismissals - when you can still bring a claim
A valid 90 day trial period can prevent a Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified dismissal. But trial periods have strict requirements. If the clause or notice is defective, you may still have a claim. A 90-day trial period can be a legitimate tool, but it is technical and interpreted strictly. Small defects commonly invalidate the trial, which can reopen an unjustified dismissal claim.
This page is written for both employees and employers. If you've been dismissed "on a trial" (or you're considering dismissing someone), pay close attention to the formation of the agreement and the notice process - that is where most cases are won or lost.
90 day trial mistakes
Any defect can allow an employee to pursue an unjustified dismissal claim. Employers are still getting the 90 day trial period wrong when attempting to hire and fire new staff. These are the most common failure points we see in practice:
- No written employment agreement. (A trial period must be in the written agreement.)
- Agreement signed after work started - even "starting work" for a short period, training, induction, or doing tasks before signing can be fatal.
- The employee started work before being given an employment agreement to sign that contains a trial period clause.
- Employment agreement does not contain a trial period clause.
- The clause does not say all of the required things (eg, it doesn't clearly state the employer can dismiss during the period, and the employee cannot bring a PG / legal proceedings about dismissal).
- Trial period does not comply with conditions set out in section 67A of the Act.
- Unclear start date - the trial period does not accurately particularise when the trial period begins. This can also become a difficulty where there's a training period or period of induction and the start date of the trial period is not clear.
- Unclear end date / duration - the trial period does not accurately particularise the duration of the trial or when the trial period would end. An example is "up to 90 days" (ambiguous, not an exact period).
- "Three months" - common drafting mistake. Three months can exceed 90 days, and that can invalidate the clause.
- Not a "new employee" - a trial period generally cannot be used if the employee has previously worked for the employer.
- Immigration/visa restrictions ignored - certain visa categories can restrict the use of trial periods (check before you rely on one).
- Trying to use "trial shifts" as unpaid labour - a trial period is not a free work arrangement. If a person is working as an employee, wages and minimum entitlements apply.
- Bad record-keeping - the employer cannot later prove the agreement was provided, explained, signed in time, and that the employee had a fair opportunity to seek advice.
- And the list goes on...
Why the courts take a strict approach
Trial periods remove one of the core protections in NZ employment law (the ability to bring a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal), so courts and the Authority tend to interpret these clauses strictly. In plain English: if an employer wants the benefit of the trial regime, they must follow the law and their own paperwork exactly.
90 day trial dismissal
Very often we find that the employer will get the notice process wrong when the employer writes and issues the termination letter. Trial period clauses are interpreted strictly - and that includes the notice wording and timing.
The biggest trap: timing
Notice must be given during the trial period. The employee's last day can fall after the trial ends, as long as notice was provided in time. Many employers miss this by days (or even hours) due to poor calendar counting or delayed letters.
90 day trial period termination letter notice mistakes include:
- The termination letter is written to the effect that termination of employment is immediate (despite a notice requirement).
- The termination letter refers to making payment in lieu of notice, however the trial period clause does not permit the employer to make a payment in lieu of notice of termination. Put another way, the employee is entitled to work their notice period unless the contract clearly allows otherwise (and it is done correctly).
- Notice paid to the employee is deficient in its quantum, or the wrong notice is paid.
- Notice is not in the required form (eg, the agreement requires written notice but the employer tries to do it verbally or by a casual text).
- The letter does not clearly state it is a trial period notice and fails to reference the relevant clause / notice period.
- Notice is given late (outside the trial period), even if only slightly late.
- And the list goes on...
Minimum content we recommend in a trial period termination letter
- Clear statement that the employer is giving notice of termination under the trial period clause.
- Reference to the specific clause and the notice period being applied.
- State the date notice is given, the last day of employment, and whether the employee is to work the notice or will be paid in lieu (only if permitted).
- Confirm final pay items: wages to last day, holiday pay (and any other contractual entitlements).
- Keep it tight - adding unnecessary "reasons" can create disputes or other claim angles if the reasons are inaccurate or unsupported.
Employee rights during a 90 day trial
A trial period does not turn an employee into a second-class worker. Pay, leave, and health and safety obligations still apply. The main carve-out is the ability to bring a personal grievance / legal proceedings about dismissal if - and only if - the trial is valid and the employer acts within it.
What claims can still exist even if the trial is valid?
- Discrimination, harassment, and other prohibited conduct claims are not "deleted" by a trial period.
- Wages / holiday pay issues (including arrears and incorrect final pay).
- Disadvantage type claims (for example, unjustified action short of dismissal), depending on the facts.
- Whistleblowing / protected disclosure issues (highly fact-dependent).
Practical checklists
For employers: "Is our trial clause likely to work?"
- Employment agreement was provided and signed before the employee started any work/training/induction.
- Trial period is an exact number of calendar days (eg, 90 days, 60 days), not "up to...".
- Clause states: (1) trial period from the beginning of employment; (2) employer may dismiss during trial; (3) no PG / legal proceedings about dismissal.
- Employee is genuinely "new" (has not worked for the employer before).
- Notice period is clear, and you can demonstrate notice was given within the trial period.
- Final pay calculations match the contract and Holidays Act entitlements.
For employees: "What evidence should I gather?"
- The employment agreement (all pages) and the signature page (including dates/times if shown).
- Proof of when you first started work (rosters, timesheets, texts, emails, site induction records).
- Any "offer of employment" emails and attachments.
- The termination letter/email/text and any follow-up messages.
- Payslips and final pay details (including holiday pay).
- Anything suggesting the real reason for dismissal was unlawful (eg, discrimination/retaliation).
Trial period vs probation period (quick distinction)
A probationary period is different. Employers generally must still follow a fair process and have good reasons to dismiss during probation. A trial period (if valid) limits dismissal challenge rights - but only for dismissal, and only if the legal requirements are met.
Need help?
If you're an employee dismissed on a "trial period", we can assess whether the trial was valid and whether a claim can be pursued. If you're an employer, we can review your onboarding documents and help you avoid expensive technical mistakes.
Quick reality check
- Trial period clauses must be correct: small drafting errors can make them invalid.
- Timing matters: trial terms must be agreed before the employee starts work.
- Notice requirements matter: some trial clauses still require notice to end employment.
Read our full article
We write for the Deals on Wheels magazine. Read our full article here: 90 day trial period law
Related articles
Browse all articlesMedical incapacity dismissal: fair process and reasonable timeframes
Employers are not expected to keep a sick or incapacitated employee's job open for an indefinite period. The tests of fairness and reasonableness apply.
Evidence for unjustified dismissal personal grievance claims: what to collect
Unfair Dismissal and Personal Grievance cases require the employee to give evidence and provide clear and convincing proof to support their claim. Employee advice on evidence gathering.
Unjustified redundancy: when redundancy becomes an unfair dismissal personal grievance
The Employment Court upheld a determination of the Employment Relations Authority that an employer pay its former employee substantial compensation for hurt and humiliation in remedy of the redundancy having been found unjustifiable.
Who is the employer? identifying the true employer in NZ employment claims
Where there is confusion or ambiguity of the identity of the employer the legal test requires an objective observation of the employment relationship at its outset with knowledge of all relevant communications between employer and employee.
Recording workplace conversation in NZ: what is legal and what backfires
You do not need permission to record a conversation that you are party to but there are consequences that you may face later if you record conversations without permission.
Disciplinary meetings: employee rights and common employer mistakes
In a disciplinary meeting an employee has rights to procedural fairness and to be fairly heard. We represent employees at disciplinary meetings.
