ClickCease

Crawford Morris v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2025] NZERA 612 - summary dismissal held unjustified; reinstatement declined; $20,000 compensation after contribution

A long-serving firefighter was summarily dismissed for alleged serious misconduct. The ERA held the conduct relied on did not meet the serious misconduct threshold and the dismissal was unjustified. Reinstatement was declined as not reasonable or workable. Remedies included $25,000 compensation...


Crawford Morris v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2025] NZERA 612

This page summarises and displays the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination Crawford Morris v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2025] NZERA 612 (Christchurch registry, Member David G Beck).

Outcome at a glance

  • Unjustified dismissal: the Authority held Mr Morris was unjustifiably dismissed and that a fair and reasonable employer could not have concluded he engaged in serious misconduct.
  • Reinstatement: declined (relationship too broken; not reasonable or workable in all the circumstances).
  • Compensation: $25,000 assessed for hurt and humiliation, reduced by 20% contribution to $20,000 payable within 28 days (no deductions).
  • Lost remuneration: six days ordinary time pay (after offsets for one month pay in lieu of notice and ACC payments).
  • Costs: reserved.

Case details

Citation [2025] NZERA 612
ERA registry Christchurch
Member David G Beck
Case number 3373783
Role Volunteer Support Officer (VSO), Greymouth
Dismissal Summary dismissal on 7 April 2025
Investigation meeting 30 June, 1 July 2025 and 15 August 2025 (Christchurch)
Date of determination 30 September 2025

What happened (chronology)

  • 11 March 2024: Mr Morris introduced himself to a volunteer brigade ("Brigade X") and made comments comparing the physical strengths of men and women in a firefighting environment.
  • 7 June 2024: after a call-out, Brigade X attended the Greymouth station for gear swap. A dispute arose about the female volunteer firefighter's suit sizing. The Authority later described the interaction as significantly insensitive and consistent with "workplace incivility", but short of bullying or harassment.
  • 10 June 2024: a further exchange occurred at Brigade X's station about the sizing issue. The complainant said she felt intimidated; Mr Morris said he did not intend that. After leaving the station, he sat in his vehicle across the road for about 10 to 15 minutes, which was treated by the employer as potentially intimidatory.
  • June 2024 onwards: complaints were escalated and the matter moved into an independent investigation process.
  • 18 December 2024: Fairway issued its final findings report. It found the introductory speech allegation was not sustained as incivility/bullying/harassment/victimisation, but the gear and station allegations were sustained as breaches of the Code and "workplace incivility".
  • 7 April 2025: Mr Morris was summarily dismissed after a lengthy investigation period and agreed paid leave.
  • 30 September 2025: the Authority issued this merits determination and remedies.

Key legal issues the ERA addressed

  • Investigation quality: whether the independent investigation was "full and fair". The Authority found the investigation was broadly consistent with the terms of reference and was thorough, despite some criticisms (leading questions; confusion about burden; and scope widening to include the introductory mihi).
  • Justification test: whether dismissal met the standard in section 103A (fair and reasonable employer), assessed in context of good faith obligations.
  • Serious misconduct threshold: whether the established conduct was capable of being characterised as serious misconduct (and if so, whether summary dismissal was warranted in all the circumstances).
  • Remedies and contribution: reinstatement (primary remedy where practicable and reasonable), lost wages/lost remuneration, compensation for hurt and humiliation, and whether remedies should be reduced for contributory conduct.

Findings on investigation and decision-making

Investigation: the Authority accepted Fairway produced useful factual findings and that the process, overall, allowed the decision-maker to then evaluate policy breaches and seriousness. The Authority also recorded that, when asked directly at the investigation meeting, Mr Morris said he could not think of anything unfair about the Fairway investigation "in a nutshell".

Why the dismissal was unjustified

The Authority's core conclusion was that FENZ did not reasonably establish that Mr Morris's overall conduct met the threshold of serious misconduct. The Authority considered the conduct was more consistent with an emerging performance or misconduct issue related to communication style, which should have been addressed earlier through counselling and/or a performance plan rather than summary dismissal.

Threshold analysis

  • 7 June gear incident: insensitive handling, but the Authority found no reasonable employer could treat it as serious misconduct in isolation.
  • 10 June station incident: ill-judged persistence about sizing; the complainant was distressed; but the Authority found it was not reasonable to conclude serious misconduct from that exchange alone, and the employer could not conclusively treat the "waiting across the road" as intimidatory merely because the complainant was upset.
  • Overall: FENZ could not fairly and reasonably conclude serious misconduct warranting summary dismissal.

Reinstatement (declined)

Mr Morris sought reinstatement. The Authority approached reinstatement as the primary remedy, but emphasised it must be both practicable and reasonable. Although the position remained unfilled, the Authority declined reinstatement on the basis that the relationship was too broken and reintegration would likely be unworkable, including due to ongoing trust issues and the operational reality of supporting volunteer brigades.

Practical note: This part of the decision is a reminder that even where dismissal is found unjustified, reinstatement can still be refused where the Authority is not objectively satisfied it is reasonable and workable in all the circumstances.

Remedies awarded

Compensation for hurt and humiliation

The Authority assessed compensation at $25,000 for the impact of dismissal, including loss of mana and the consequences in a small community. It then found contributory conduct and reduced the compensatory award by 20% to $20,000.

  • Payable: within 28 days of issue of the determination
  • Basis: s 123(1)(c)(i) Employment Relations Act 2000
  • Deductions: none (ordered without deductions)

Lost remuneration

Mr Morris remained on ACC earnings-related compensation (80% of normal pay) after dismissal until 15 June 2025, and he was paid one month full pay in lieu of notice. The Authority treated ACC payments and the notice payment as offsets and concluded there was no lost wages up to the end of June 2025.

Exercising discretion, the Authority effectively arrived at six days ordinary time remuneration payable (at the rate applicable on termination). The Authority did not make any additional award of lost remuneration.

  • Basis: ordered as lost remuneration (six days ordinary time)
  • Offsets considered: notice pay and ACC payments

Costs

Costs were reserved. The parties were encouraged to resolve costs between themselves; if not resolved, the applicant could file a costs memorandum within 28 days.

Practical takeaways

  • Do not conflate incivility with serious misconduct: where conduct is better characterised as communication or relationship failure, performance management is often the appropriate tool, not summary dismissal.
  • Keep investigation scope tight: terms of reference matter. If the scope changes, ensure the employee is clearly informed and given full opportunity to respond.
  • Decision-maker focus: even where an independent investigation is broadly fair, the final disciplinary decision must still meet the s 103A standard.
  • Reinstatement is not automatic: it remains the primary remedy in principle, but can be declined where the employment relationship is objectively too broken and reintegration is unworkable.
  • Offsets in lost wages: ACC payments and notice payments can materially reduce (or eliminate) lost wage awards.

Read the full ERA determination (embedded)

If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button to open it in a new tab.

Open [2025] NZERA 612 (PDF)

Mobile / tablet tip: Some browsers do not display embedded PDFs reliably. Use the "Open" button above.
Need help with a PG for unjustified dismissal? We can help with strategy, drafting, settlement, mediation, and representation in the ERA. (PG = Personal Grievance; ERA = Employment Relations Authority.)

Contact Employer Case Form Employee Unfair Dismissal Case Form

Unfair Dismissal Cases
0800 WIN KIWI

Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search

Related articles

Browse all articles
Based on: Unfair Dismissal Cases
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was employed by OH and N Contracting Limited as a site foreman in a logging operation. The ERA accepted there was some genuine business basis for redundancy because the logging work was nearing completion, the company had not secured other work, and the need for workers was reducing. But the dismissal was still unjustified because OH and N did not follow any real good-faith consultation process before ending Mr Powell's employment. The employer also wrongly used annual holiday pay instead of paying notice wages, failed to provide wage and time records when requested, and was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, unpaid wages, penalties, and to allow limited personal recovery against the director if the company could not pay...

Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was employed by OH and N Contracting Limited as a forestry worker from November 2022 until his employment ended on redundancy grounds in January 2025. The ERA accepted there was some genuine business basis for redundancy because the logging work was nearing completion, the company had not secured other work, and the need for workers was reducing. But the dismissal was still unjustified because OH and N did not follow a good-faith restructuring process before ending Mr Powell's employment. The employer also wrongly used annual holiday pay instead of notice wages, failed to provide the employment agreement and wage and time records when requested, and was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, unpaid wages and penalties...

Jia Jia v TBS Trading Limited and Helen Han [2026] NZERA 478 - no employment agreement, late wages and radio-silent dismissal

Jia Jia worked for TBS Trading Limited as a retail sales assistant for about two and a half months. She was not given a written employment agreement, her wages were not always paid on time, and her employment ended after the employer stopped offering her full-time work and then stopped offering her work at all. The ERA found unjustified dismissal and unjustified disadvantage. It ordered two months' lost wages, $12,500 compensation, penalties for failing to provide an employment agreement and late wage payment, costs and the filing fee. Helen Han was not found personally liable for dismissal remedies, but the ERA granted leave for Ms Jia to recover the penalties from Ms Han personally if TBS could not pay them...

OAS v JIK Limited [2026] NZERA 474 - employee dismissed after seeking family violence leave

OAS was employed as a chef by JIK Limited. After a family violence incident involving his ex-partner, OAS told the employer he needed time away from work to keep his children safe, deal with urgent family matters, meet a victim support adviser and pursue protection-order steps. JIK treated his messages as a resignation or abandonment of employment and left him off the next roster. The ERA held that OAS had not resigned or abandoned his job. He was entitled to family violence leave and JIK's decision not to roster him again was a dismissal. The dismissal was unjustified because JIK failed to engage with the family violence situation and dismissed him for missing work when he was entitled to be away. The Authority awarded compensation and lost wages, reduced by 10 percent for contribution...

Duane April v Coatrite Fire Limited [2026] NZERA 466 - visa worker underpaid, racialised comments, unlawful deductions and unjustified dismissal

Duane April came to New Zealand on an accredited employer work visa to work for Coatrite Fire Limited as an industrial/intumescent spray painter. The ERA found he had been unjustifiably disadvantaged by underpayment at $35 rather than the agreed $38 per hour, unauthorised wage deductions, racialised comments, and an unjustified verbal warning. His later dismissal was also unjustified. The employer failed to provide sufficient information about the allegations, unfairly denied remote support from Mr April's father, relied on matters not properly investigated, and dismissed him after a meeting that had ended with an apparent understanding the employment relationship would continue. Coatrite was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, arrears, interest and a $4,000 penalty, while most of its claimed set-off against Mr April was rejected...

Qi Sun v Keene Construction Limited [2026] NZERA 465 - builder dismissed by text after querying apprenticeship costs

Qi Sun was employed by Keene Construction Limited as an apprentice builder. After he queried an unpaid $300 apprenticeship-cost payment, the company director texted that there was not going to be a company anymore and told him not to bother coming into work. The ERA found it was reasonable for Mr Sun to understand that he had been dismissed. Keene Construction provided no evidence, filed no reply, did not attend the investigation meeting, and did not justify the dismissal. The Authority awarded lost wages, compensation, wage and holiday pay arrears, and costs...

Browse topics